Single versus splinted short implants at sinus augmented sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis - 21/05/21
, Joannis Katsoulis a, f, Sreenivas Koka g, h, i, Kensuke Igarashi a, jBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
| pages | 8 |
| Iconographies | 3 |
| Vidéos | 0 |
| Autres | 0 |
Highlights |
• | Single and splinted short and extra-short press-fit sintered porous-surfaced implants had similar clinical outcomes in the augmented maxilla. |
• | No previous studies have directly compared splinted and non-splinted short implants with a rough surface in sinus lifted scenarios. |
• | Prospective studies with adequate sample sizes should confirm whether the prosthesis type is a concern in the aforementioned scenarios. |
Abstract |
Objective |
This review primarily evaluated the success, survival and failure rates of implants shorter than 10 mm restored with single-unit or splinted fixed dental prostheses in maxillary sinus augmented sites.
Material and methods |
Two reviewers independently performed the systematic search of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL, up to September 2019 with no language restriction. A supplemental hand search consisted of screening 13 journals. The inclusion criteria were: primary studies reporting implant, prosthetic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of extra-short and short implants placed in conjunction with sinus floor elevation in partially dentate patients, restored with single- and splinted-crowns for direct comparison, with a minimal 1-year follow-up. Weighted arithmetic mean (WAM) of the implant survival was performed according to the type of prosthesis. This was confirmed by using Review Manager software to perform meta-analysis.
Results |
Two observational studies reporting on 106 tapered, press-fit, sintered porous-surfaced implants with a length ranging from 5 mm to 9 mm were included in this systematic review. Of these, 20 and 86 implants were restored with single and splinted prostheses, respectively. The risk ratio (RR) was 1.16 (95% CI: .31–4.30, p = .58, I² = 0%) for individually restored implants failure when compared to splinted implants, indicating that short dental implants restored with single crowns could have a 16% higher possibility of failure if compared to implants with splinted crowns. The heterogeneity value was not statistically significative (p = .58). No statistical difference in the implant survival rate of the two types of analysed prostheses was observed after WAM (p= .923). The level of evidence for the included studies ranged from low (4) to fair (2B).
Conclusion |
Similar clinical outcomes up to a 9-year follow-up were observed in single and splinted porous-surfaced implants shorter than 10 mm located in sites with sinus lift. However, the conclusion shall be interpreted with caution due to the level of evidence and limited number of included studies included in this systematic review.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Crowns, Dental implants, Maxilla, Sinus floor augmentation, Outcome assessment, Fixed dental prosthesis.
Plan
Vol 122 - N° 3
P. 303-310 - juin 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Clinical performance of alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogeneic bone block grafts versus autogenous bone block grafts. A systematic review
- Luis Sánchez-Labrador, Pedro Molinero-Mourelle, Fabián Pérez-González, Luis Miguel Saez-Alcaide, Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann, Juan López-Quiles Martínez, Jose María Martínez-González
- Combined mentalis weakening and periosteal flaps in mandibular anterior alveolar corticotomy-assisted orthodontics with bone grafting
- I. Saint-Surin, R. Castrot, C. Vandersteen, A. Oueiss, C. Savoldelli
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?