Implementing daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing in VA settings: The human factors engineering to prevent resistant organisms (HERO) project - 25/05/21
, Jackson S. Musuuza, MBBS, MPH, PhD a, b, Linda McKinley, RN, MPH a, b, Michele L. Zimbric, BS a, Kelsey Baubie, MPH, MS b, Ann Schoofs Hundt, PhD c, d, Pascale Carayon, PhD c, d, Mary Hagle, PhD, RN, FAAN e, Christopher D. Pfeiffer, MD, MHS f, g, Marinella D. Galea, MD h, i, j, Christopher J Crnich, MD, PhD a, b, Nasia Safdar, MD, PhD a, bRésumé |
Background |
Daily use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to reduce risk of healthcare-associated infections. We aimed to assess moving CHG bathing into routine practice using a human factors approach. We evaluated implementation in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings in the Veterans Health Administration.
Methods |
Our multiple case study approach included non-ICU units from 4 Veterans Health Administration settings. Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety, we conducted focus groups and interviews to capture barriers and facilitators to daily CHG bathing. We measured compliance using observations and skin CHG concentrations.
Results |
Barriers to daily CHG include time, concern of increasing antibiotic resistance, workflow and product concerns. Facilitators include engagement of champions and unit shared responsibility. We found shortfalls in patient education, hand hygiene and CHG use on tubes and drains. CHG skin concentration levels were highest among patients from spinal cord injury units. These units applied antiseptic using 2% CHG impregnated wipes vs 4% CHG solution/soap.
Discussion |
Non-ICUs implementing CHG bathing must consider human factors and work system barriers to ensure uptake and sustained practice change.
Conclusions |
Well-planned rollouts and a unit culture promoting shared responsibility are key to compliance with daily CHG bathing. Successful implementation requires attention to staff education and measurement of compliance.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : Quality improvement, Systems engineering, Organizational culture, Contextual factors, Champions, Case study
Plan
| Conflicts of interest: None to report. |
Vol 49 - N° 6
P. 775-783 - juin 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Chlorhexidine gluconate does not result in epidermal microbiota dysbiosis in healthy adults
- Timothy L Wiemken, Aaron C Ericsson
- Does the removal of contact precautions for MRSA and VRE infected patients change health care-associated infection rate?: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Robert Kleyman, Sophia Cupril-Nilson, Kent Robinson, Shaival Thakore, Furqan Haq, Liwei Chen, Olugbenga Oyesanmi, Kimberly Browning, Joseph Pino, Rahul Mhaskar
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?