Predicting Ambulance Patient Wait Times: A Multicenter Derivation and Validation Study - 21/06/21
, Jirayus Jiarpakdee, BEng, PhD e, Anne Loupis, BSc (Hons) b, d, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, BEng, PhD e, Keith Joe, MBChB, FACEM a, f, Michael Ben-Meir, MBBS, FACEM a, g, Hamed Akhlaghi, FACEM, PhD h, Jennie Hutton, FACEM, MPH h, i, Wei Wang, PhD, MD b, j, Michael Stephenson, BHealthSci, GradDipHealthSci k, l, m, Gabriel Blecher, MBBS, FACEM a, d, n, Paul Buntine, MBBS, FACEM o, p, Amy Sweeny, RN, MPH (Epid) q, r, Burak Turhan, MSc, PhD son behalf of the
Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, Clinical Trials Network
Abstract |
Study objective |
To derive and internally and externally validate machine-learning models to predict emergency ambulance patient door–to–off-stretcher wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments.
Methods |
Nine emergency departments provided 3 years (2017 to 2019) of retrospective administrative data from Australia. Descriptive and exploratory analyses were undertaken on the datasets. Statistical and machine-learning models were developed to predict wait times at each site and were internally and externally validated.
Results |
There were 421,894 episodes analyzed, and median site off-load times varied from 13 (interquartile range [IQR], 9 to 20) to 29 (IQR, 16 to 48) minutes. The global site prediction model median absolute errors were 11.7 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7 to 11.8) using linear regression and 12.8 minutes (95% CI, 12.7 to 12.9) using elastic net. The individual site model prediction median absolute errors varied from the most accurate at 6.3 minutes (95% CI, 6.2 to 6.4) to the least accurate at 16.1 minutes (95% CI, 15.8 to 16.3). The model technique performance was the same for linear regression, random forests, elastic net, and rolling average. The important variables were the last k-patient average waits, triage category, and patient age. The global model performed at the lower end of the accuracy range compared with models for the individual sites but was within tolerable limits.
Conclusion |
Electronic emergency demographic and flow information can be used to estimate emergency ambulance patient off-stretcher times. Models can be built with reasonable accuracy for multiple hospitals using a small number of point-of-care variables.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Please see page 114 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
| Supervising editor: Stephen Schenkel, MD, MPP. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors. |
|
| Author contributions: KJW was the principal investigator. KJ, KJW, and MBM were responsible for funding. KJW, BT, CT, JJ, and WW developed the study design and protocol. All authors revised the study protocol. KJW and AL provided ethics/governance. HA, GB, PB, KJW, and AS were the site chief investigators. AL, HA, PB, KJW, and AS collected the data. JJ, CT, and BT analyzed the data. KJW, JJ, CT, and BT wrote the manuscript and all authors revised the manuscript. KJW and BT take responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
| All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. |
|
| Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The Medical Research Future Fund, by Monash Partners, funded this study. Researchers contributed in kind donations of time. The Cabrini Institute and Monash University provided research infrastructure support. |
Vol 78 - N° 1
P. 113-122 - juillet 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
