Applying the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to Safe Surgery 2020 Implementation in Tanzania's Lake Zone - 22/07/21
, Noor Zanial, MSc a, John G. Meara, MD, DMD, MBA, FACS a, b, David Barash, MD c, Ladislaus Buberwa d, Bwire Chirangi, MSc, MPH e, Augustino Hellar, MD, MBA f, Steve Kisakye, MD g, Adelina Mazhiqi, MD a, William Mnyonyela h, Meck P. Nyanda, MD l, Cheri Reynolds, JD m, Florian Tinuga, MD, MPH i, Ntuli A. Kapologwe, MD, PhD i, j, Sarah Maongezi, MD, MPH kAbstract |
Background |
Access to safe, high-quality surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa is a critical gap. Interventions to improve surgical quality have been developed, but research on their implementation is still at a nascent stage. We retrospectively applied the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework to characterize the implementation of Safe Surgery 2020, a multicomponent intervention to improve surgical quality.
Methods |
We used a longitudinal, qualitative research design to examine Safe Surgery 2020 in 10 health facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone. We used documentation analysis with confirmatory key informant interviews (n = 6) to describe the exploration and preparation phases. We conducted interviews with health facility leaders and surgical team members at 1, 6, and 12 months (n = 101) post initiation to characterize the implementation phase. Data were analyzed using the constant comparison method.
Results |
In the exploration phase, research, expert consultation, and scoping activities revealed the need for a multicomponent intervention to improve surgical quality. In the preparation phase, onsite visits identified priorities and barriers to implementation to adapt the intervention components and curriculum. In the active implementation phase, 4 themes related to the inner organizational context—vision for safe surgery, existing surgical practices, leadership support, and resilience—and 3 themes related to the intervention—innovation-value fit, holistic approach, and buy-in—facilitated or hindered implementation. Interviewees perceived improvements in teamwork and communication and intra- and inter-facility learning, and their need to deliver safe surgery evolved during the implementation period.
Conclusions |
Examining implementation through the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment phases offers insights into the implementation of interventions to improve surgical quality and promote sustainability.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Visual Abstract |
Abbreviationand Acronyms : EBP, EPIS, SS2020, SSC
Plan
| Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose. |
|
| Support: This work was supported by the GE Foundation (28045607) and Elma Philanthropies (17-F0012). |
|
| Disclaimer: GE Foundation and Elma Philanthropies as entities were not involved in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to submit the findings for publication, or drafting of the manuscript. David Barash, as an individual, had a role in the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript and is an author on this paper. |
|
| Dr Alidina and Ms Zanial contributed equally to this work as first authors. Drs Kapologwe and Maongezi contributed equally to this work as senior authors. |
Vol 233 - N° 2
P. 177 - août 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
