S'abonner

Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial - 31/07/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00297-7 
Xiaotian Zhang, ProfMD a, , Han Liang, ProfMD b, , Ziyu Li, ProfMD a, , Yingwei Xue, ProfMD c, , Yanong Wang, ProfMD e, Zhiwei Zhou, ProfMD f, Jiren Yu, ProfMD g, Zhaode Bu, ProfMD a, Lin Chen, ProfMD l, Yian Du, ProfMD i, Xinbao Wang, ProfMD i, Aiwen Wu, ProfMD a, Guoli Li, ProfMD j, Xiangqian Su, ProfMD a, Gang Xiao, ProfMD k, Ming Cui, ProfMD a, Dan Wu, ProfMD l, Li Chen, ProfMD h, Xiaojiang Wu, ProfMD a, Yanbing Zhou, ProfMD m, Lianhai Zhang, Prof a, Chengxue Dang, ProfMD n, Yulong He, ProfMD o, Zhongtao Zhang, ProfMD p, Yihong Sun, ProfMD q, Yong Li, ProfMD r, Huanqiu Chen, ProfMD s, Yuxian Bai, ProfMD d, Changsong Qi, MD a, Peiwu Yu, ProfMD t, Guanbao Zhu, ProfMD u, Jian Suo, ProfMD v, Baoqing Jia, ProfMD h, Leping Li, ProfMD w, Changming Huang, ProfMD x, Fei Li, ProfMD y, Yingjiang Ye, ProfMD z, Huimian Xu, ProfMD aa, Xin Wang, ProfMD ab, Yannan Yuan, MS a, Jian-Yu E, MD ac, Xiangji Ying, MS a, Chen Yao, ProfMD ad, Lin Shen, ProfMD a, , Jiafu Ji, ProfMD a,
on behalf of the

RESOLVE study group

a Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China 
b Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China 
c Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China 
d Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China 
e Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China 
f Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China 
g Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China 
h Department of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China 
i Department of Gastric Surgery and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China 
j Department of General surgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China 
k Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China 
l Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China 
m Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China 
n Department of Oncology Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China 
o Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China 
p Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 
q Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Guangzhou, China 
r Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China 
s Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China 
t Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China 
u Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China 
v Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China 
w Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China 
x Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China 
y Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 
z Department of General Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China 
aa Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China 
ab Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China 
ac Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA 
ad Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China 

* Correspondence to: Prof Jiafu Ji, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education) Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute Beijing 100142 China ** Prof Lin Shen, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education) Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute Beijing 100142 China

Summary

Background

The optimal perioperative chemotherapeutic regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative and postoperative S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) compared with postoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy.

Methods

We did this open-label, phase 3, superiority and non-inferiority, randomised trial at 27 hospitals in China. We recruited antitumour treatment-naive patients aged 18 years or older with historically confirmed cT4a N+ M0 or cT4b Nany M0 gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with Karnofsky performance score of 70 or more. Patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via an interactive web response system, stratified by participating centres and Lauren classification, to receive adjuvant CapOx (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day), adjuvant SOX (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral S-1 40–60 mg twice a day), or perioperative SOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day plus oral S-1 40–60 mg twice a day for three cycles preoperatively and five cycles postoperatively followed by three cycles of S-1 monotherapy). The primary endpoint, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, is 3-year disease-free survival to assess the superiority of perioperative-SOX compared with adjuvant-CapOx and the non-inferiority (hazard ratio non-inferiority margin of 1·33) of adjuvant-SOX compared with adjuvant-CapOx. Safety analysis were done in patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01534546.

Findings

Between Aug 15, 2012, and Feb 28, 2017, 1094 patients were screened and 1022 (93%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 345 (34%) patients were assigned to the adjuvant-CapOx, 340 (33%) patients to the adjuvant-SOX group, and 337 (33%) patients to the perioperative-SOX group. 3-year disease-free survival was 51·1% (95% CI 45·5–56·3) in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 56·5% (51·0–61·7) in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 59·4% (53·8–64·6) in the perioperative-SOX group. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0·77 (95% CI 0·61–0·97; Wald p=0·028) for the perioperative-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group and 0·86 (0·68–1·07; Wald p=0·17) for the adjuvant-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events was neutropenia (32 [12%] of 258 patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 21 [8%] of 249 patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 30 [10%] of 310 patients in the perioperative-SOX group). Serious adverse events were reported in seven (3%) of 258 patients in adjuvant-CapOx group, two of which were related to treatment; eight (3%) of 249 patients in adjuvant-SOX group, two of which were related to treatment; and seven (2%) of 310 patients in perioperative-SOX group, four of which were related to treatment. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Interpretation

Perioperative-SOX showed a clinically meaningful improvement compared with adjuvant-CapOx in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who had D2 gastrectomy; adjuvant-SOX was non-inferior to adjuvant-CapOx in these patients. Perioperative-SOX could be considered a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China, Beijing Scholars Program 2018–2024, Peking University Clinical Scientist Program, Taiho, Sanofi-Aventis, and Hengrui Pharmaceutical.

Translation

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 22 - N° 8

P. 1081-1092 - août 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Global burden of cancer in 2020 attributable to alcohol consumption: a population-based study
  • Harriet Rumgay, Kevin Shield, Hadrien Charvat, Pietro Ferrari, Bundit Sornpaisarn, Isidore Obot, Farhad Islami, Valery E P P Lemmens, Jürgen Rehm, Isabelle Soerjomataram
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • RETRACTION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus pembrolizumab and trametinib versus stereotactic body radiotherapy plus gemcitabine for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial
  • Xiaofei Zhu, Yangsen Cao, Wenyu Liu, Xiaoping Ju, Xianzhi Zhao, Lingong Jiang, Yusheng Ye, Gang Jin, Huojun Zhang

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.