Probability of Postoperative Complication after Liver Resection: Stratification of Patient Factors, Operative Complexity, and Use of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery - 23/08/21
, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, MD, PhD b, Michael Schneider, MD a, Giulia Piazza, MD a, Ismail Labgaa, MD a, Gaëtan-Romain Joliat, MD a, Emmanuel Melloul, MD a, Emilie Uldry, MD a, Nicolas Demartines, MD, FACS, FRCS, FCCS(Hon) a, ⁎ , Nermin Halkic, MD aAbstract |
Background |
The current study aimed to assess the performance of the 3-level complexity classification that stratified liver resection procedures into 3 complexity grades (grade I, low; grade II, intermediate; and grade III, high complexity) and to evaluate whether the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol improves postoperative outcomes for each complexity grade.
Study Design |
Consecutive patients undergoing open liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection at Lausanne University Hospital during 2010 to 2020 were assessed.
Results |
A total of 437 patients were included. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay increased significantly, with a stepwise increase of the grades from I to III in open liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection (all, p < 0.05). The same trend for Comprehensive Complication Index was found in open liver resection (p < 0.005). Age (p = 0.004), 3-level complexity classification (grade II vs I; p = 0.001; grade III vs I; p < 0.001), no use of the ERAS protocol (p = 0.016), and biliary reconstruction (p < 0.001) were significant predictors for postoperative complication, defined as Comprehensive Complication Index ≥ 26.2 in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The prediction model incorporating the 4 factors had a calculated Concordance Index of 0.735 and 0.742 based on the bootstrapping method. The use of ERAS protocol was associated with lower probability of postoperative complication for each complexity grade and age.
Conclusions |
The use of ERAS protocol can decrease the probability of postoperative complication for each surgical complexity of liver resection and patient age. This finding emphasized the importance of tailoring perioperative management according to surgical complexity and patient age to improve outcomes after liver resection.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Visual Abstract |
Abbreviations and Acronyms : AUC, CCI, ERAS, LLR, OLR, OR
Plan
| CME questions for this article available at jacscme.facs.org |
|
| Disclosure Information: Authors have nothing to disclose. Timothy J Eberlein, Editor-in-Chief, has nothing to disclose. Ronald J Weigel, CME Editor, has nothing to disclose. |
Vol 233 - N° 3
P. 357 - septembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Surgeon Volume and Risk of Reoperation after Laparoscopic Primary Ventral Hernia Repair: A Nationwide Register-Based Study
- Camilla Christophersen, Siv Fonnes, Jason Joe Baker, Kristoffer Andresen, Jacob Rosenberg
- Survey of American College of Surgeons Members on Firearm Injury Prevention
- Deborah A. Kuhls, Brendan T. Campbell, Arielle Thomas, Holly Michaels, Eileen M. Bulger, Ronald M. Stewart
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?