S'abonner

Arthroscopic bone block stabilisation procedures for glenoid bone loss in anterior glenohumeral instability: A systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes - 24/08/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102949 
Muaaz Tahir a, , Shahbaz Malik b, Robert Jordan a, Madara Kronberga a, Peter D’Alessandro c, Adnan Saithna d
a Trauma and orthopaedic surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, B15 2TH Birmingham, UK 
b Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK 
c Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth, Australia 
d Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, MO, USA 

Corresponding author. Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, B15 2TH Birmingham, UK.Queen Elizabeth Hospital BirminghamMindelsohn WayBirminghamB15 2THUK

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Introduction

Recurrent shoulder instability is frequently associated with glenohumeral bone loss. Recently there has been a surge of interest in arthroscopically performed bone block procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic glenoid bone block stabilisation for recurrent anterior dislocation.

Methods

This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy was applied to MEDLINE and Embase databases on 20th July 2020. Studies reporting either clinical or radiological outcomes following arthroscopic bone block stabilisation for recurrent anterior dislocation were included. Primary outcomes were function and instability scores. Secondary outcomes included recurrent instability, graft union and resorption rates, return to activity/sports, and complications. Pooled analysis was performed when an outcome was uniformly reported by more than one study. Critical appraisal of studies was conducted using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

Results

Application of the search strategy resulted in the inclusion of 15 eligible studies; 12 used iliac crest bone graft while 3 used distal tibial allograft. The overall population comprised 265 patients (mean age range, 25.5–37.5 years; 79% of participants were men). All post-operative outcome scores were significantly improved, and the overall rate of recurrent instability was low (weighted mean 6.6%, range 0–18.2%) at mean follow up of 30.4 months. The Rowe score was the most frequently reported outcome measure, improving on average by 53.9 points at final follow-up, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Graft union rates ranged between 92–100% in 8 out of 10 studies at mean follow up range 6–78.7 months but two reported lower rates ranging from 58.3–84% for autografts and 37.5% for allografts. Graft resorption rates averaged between 10–16% for autografts and 32% for allografts. Hardware-related complications occurred in 2% with the most frequent being screw breakage or symptomatic mechanical irritation.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic bone block stabilisation is associated with high rates of graft union, significant improvements in the WOSI, Rowe, Constant and SSV scores (exceeding MCID thresholds where known), and a low rate of complications, including re-dislocation in the short to mid-term. Graft union rates were high, but the long-term implications of graft resorption (which occurs more frequently with allograft) are unknown. Longer follow-up of these patients and future experimental studies are required to further examine the effects of graft type and fixation methods.

Level of evidence

IV; systematic review.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Shoulder instability, Glenoid defect, Autograft, Allograft, Arthroscopic bone block procedure


Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 107 - N° 5

Article 102949- septembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Anterior glenohumeral instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart operation – a retrospective 5-year follow-up study
  • Simo S.A. Miettinen, Tatu Kiljunen, Antti Joukainen
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Evaluation of the subscapularis split created with passive rotation during arthroscopic dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS): A cadaveric study
  • Mohamed Ibrahim, Pablo Narbona, Patrick J. Denard, Paolo Arrigoni, Philippe Collin, Alexandre Lädermann

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.