S'abonner

Documentation of Shared Decisionmaking in the Emergency Department - 20/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.04.038 
David Chartash, PhD a, Mona Sharifi, MD, MPH a, b, Beth Emerson, MD b, c, Robert Frank, PhD d, Elizabeth M. Schoenfeld, MD, MS e, Jason Tanner, MD, PhD c, Cynthia Brandt, MD, MPH a, c, Richard A. Taylor, MD, MHS a, c,
a Center for Medical Informatics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
b Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
d Department of Linguistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 
e Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School – Baystate Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, Springfield, MS 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

While patient-centered communication and shared decisionmaking are increasingly recognized as vital aspects of clinical practice, little is known about their characteristics in real-world emergency department (ED) settings. We constructed a natural language processing tool to identify patient-centered communication as documented in ED notes and to describe visit-level, site-level, and temporal patterns within a large health system.

Methods

This was a 2-part study involving (1) the development and validation of an natural language processing tool using regular expressions to identify shared decisionmaking and (2) a retrospective analysis using mixed effects logistic regression and trend analysis of shared decisionmaking and general patient discussion using the natural language processing tool to assess ED physician and advanced practice provider notes from 2013 to 2020.

Results

Compared to chart review of 600 ED notes, the accuracy rates of the natural language processing tool for identification of shared decisionmaking and general patient discussion were 96.7% (95% CI 94.9% to 97.9%) and 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.1% to 91.3%), respectively. The natural language processing tool identified shared decisionmaking in 58,246 (2.2%) and general patient discussion in 590,933 (22%) notes. From 2013 to 2020, natural language processing-detected shared decisionmaking increased 300% and general patient discussion increased 50%. We observed higher odds of shared decisionmaking documentation among physicians versus advanced practice providers (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.23) and among female versus male patients (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.15). Black patients had lower odds of shared decisionmaking (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.88) compared with White patients. Shared decisionmaking and general patient discussion were also associated with higher levels of triage and commercial insurance status.

Conclusion

In this study, we developed and validated an natural language processing tool using regular expressions to extract shared decisionmaking from ED notes and found multiple potential factors contributing to variation, including social, demographic, temporal, and presentation characteristics.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 638 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Stephen Schenkel, MD, MPP. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: DC and RAT conceived the study and designed its methods. DC, RAT, and JT obtained the data and performed the analysis. DC and RAT drafted the manuscript, and MS, BE, RF, JT, ES, and CB contributed substantially to its revision. RAT takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Authorship: All authors attest to meeting the 4 ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. The authors report this article did not receive any outside funding or support.
 Trial registration number: N/A.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2021  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 78 - N° 5

P. 637-649 - novembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Treating Pediatric and Geriatric Patients at Risk of Suicide in General Emergency Departments: Perspectives From Emergency Department Clinical Leaders
  • Cadence F. Bowden, Gala True, Sara Wiesel Cullen, Miranda Pollock, Diana Worsley, Abigail M. Ross, Jeffrey Caterino, Mark Olfson, Steven C. Marcus, Stephanie K. Doupnik
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The Influence of the Availability Heuristic on Physicians in the Emergency Department
  • Dan P. Ly

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.