S'abonner

Systematic Review: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Instrumental Learning - 26/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.03.009 
An-Katrien Hulsbosch, MA 1, , Hasse De Meyer, PhD 1, 2, Tom Beckers, PhD 1, Marina Danckaerts, MD, PhD 1, 3, Dagmar Van Liefferinge, PhD 3, Gail Tripp, PhD 4, Saskia Van der Oord, PhD 1, 5

Profs. Tripp and Van der Oord share co-last authorship of this work.

1 Mrs. Hulsbosch, Dr. De Meyer, and Prof. Drs. Beckers, Danckaerts, and Van der Oord are with KU Leuven, Belgium 
2 Dr. De Meyer is also with the HELP University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 
3 Dr. Van Liefferinge and Prof. Dr. Danckaerts also are with the University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Belgium 
4 Prof. Dr. Tripp is with the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University, Japan 
5 Prof. Dr. Van der Oord is with the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 

Correspondence to A-K. Hulsbosch, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumKU LeuvenTiensestraat 102Leuven3000Belgium

Résumé

Objective

Although instrumental learning deficits are, among other deficits, assumed to contribute to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), no comprehensive systematic review of instrumental learning deficits in ADHD exists. This review examines differences between ADHD and typically developing (TD) children in basic instrumental learning and the effects of reinforcement form, magnitude, schedule, and complexity, as well as effects of medication, on instrumental learning in children with ADHD.

Method

A systematic search of PubMed, PsyINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE+EMBASE CLASSIC, ERIC, and Web of Science was conducted for articles up to March 16, 2020. Experimental studies comparing instrumental learning between groups (ADHD versus TD) or a manipulation of reinforcement/medication within an ADHD sample were included. Quality of studies was assessed with an adapted version of the Hombrados and Waddington criteria to assess risk of bias in (quasi-) experimental studies.

Results

A total of 19 studies from among 3,384 non-duplicate screened articles were included. No difference in basic instrumental learning was found between children with ADHD and TD children, nor effects of form or magnitude of reinforcement. Results regarding reinforcement schedule and reversal learning were mixed, but children with ADHD seemed to show deficits in conditional discrimination learning compared to TD children. Methylphenidate improved instrumental learning in children with ADHD. Quality assessment showed poor quality of studies with respect to sample sizes and outcome and missing data reporting.

Conclusion

The review identified very few and highly heterogenous studies, with inconsistent findings. No clear deficit was found in instrumental learning under laboratory conditions. Children with ADHD do show deficits in complex forms of learning, that is, conditional discrimination learning. Clearly more research is needed, using more similar task designs and manipulations.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : ADHD, instrumental learning, systematic review


Plan


 This study was funded by G.0845.19N of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).
 This article is part of a special series devoted to the subject of child and adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The series covers a range of topics in the area including genetics, neuroimaging, treatment, and others. The series was edited by Guest Editor Jonathan Posner, MD along with Deputy Editor Samuele Cortese, MD, PhD.
 This work has been prospectively registered: display_record.php?ID=CRD42020170117.
 Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Hulsbosch, De Meyer, Beckers, Danckaerts, Van Liefferinge, Tripp, Van der Oord
Data curation: Hulsbosch
Formal analysis: Hulsbosch, De Meyer, Tripp, Van der Oord
Funding acquisition: Danckaerts, Van der Oord
Investigation: Hulsbosch, De Meyer, Beckers, Tripp, Van der Oord
Methodology: Hulsbosch, De Meyer, Beckers, Tripp, Van der Oord
Project administration: Hulsbosch, Van der Oord
Resources: Van der Oord
Supervision: Beckers, Danckaerts, Tripp, Van Liefferinge, Van der Oord
Validation: Hulsbosch
Visualization: Hulsbosch, De Meyer, Beckers, Tripp, Van der Oord
Writing – original draft: Hulsbosch
Writing – review and editing: Hulsbosch, De Meyer, Beckers, Danckaerts, Van Liefferinge, Tripp, Van der Oord
 Disclosure: Drs. Danckaerts and Van Liefferinge have been involved in a clinical trial sponsored by Takeda. Drs. De Meyer, Beckers, Tripp, Van der Oord and Mrs. Hulsbosch have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.


© 2021  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 60 - N° 11

P. 1367-1381 - novembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Effectiveness of Wraparound Care Coordination for Children and Adolescents
  • Jonathan R. Olson, Philip H. Benjamin, Alya A. Azman, Marianne A. Kellogg, Michael D. Pullmann, Jesse C. Suter, Eric J. Bruns
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The Effects of At-Birth Adoption on Atypical Behavior and Anxiety: A Nonhuman Primate Model
  • Elizabeth K. Wood, Whitney F. Espinel, Jacob Hunter, Alexa Emmett, Andrea N. Skowbo, Melanie L. Schwandt, Courtney Shannon, Stephen G. Lindell, Christina S. Barr, Stephen J. Suomi, J. Dee Higley

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.