S'abonner

Do gender and racial differences exist in letters of recommendation for obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants? - 29/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.033 
Oluwateniola Brown, MD a, , Tsung Mou, MD a, Szu-In Lim, BA b, Shawn Jones, PhD, MHS c, Sari Sade d, Mary J. Kwasny, ScD e, Margaret G. Mueller, MD a, Kimberly Kenton, MD, MS a
a Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 
b Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 
c Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 
d University of Texas, Austin, TX 
e Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 

Corresponding author: Oluwateniola Brown, MD.

Abstract

Background

Studies in several fields demonstrate gender and racial differences in descriptions of applicants in letters of recommendation. However, gender and racial biases in obstetrics and gynecology residency letters of recommendation are understudied.

Objective

This study aimed to determine whether there are differences in the letters of recommendation written for medical students applying for obstetrics and gynecology residency based on applicant gender and underrepresented in medicine status.

Study Design

We analyzed all letters of recommendation submitted to a single obstetrics and gynecology residency program during the 2019–2020 application cycle using a computerized text analysis software to evaluate the presence of 25 word categories. Multivariable regression was used to compare differences in the frequency of word categories by gender and underrepresented in medicine status. Concurrently, we performed a qualitative content analysis of letters from a random sample of applicants balanced for gender and underrepresented in medicine status and explored emerging themes until thematic saturation was reached.

Results

We analyzed 3060 letters written for 834 applicants, 721 (87%) of whom were women and 198 (24%) of whom were underrepresented in medicine. Men authored 1605 letters (53%). There was no difference in word categories used in letters written for men and women applicants on multivariable analysis. Similarly, there was no word category difference between letters written for applicants who were underrepresented in medicine compared with White and Asian applicants. However, women letter writers used more communal (relationship-oriented) words compared with men letter writers (P<.001). Moreover, on the qualitative analysis of letters from a random sample of 30 applicants, comments about personality traits were frequent in all letters. Comments on surgical skills, work ethic, and leadership were found more in letters for White and Asian applicants, and phrases that were doubt raisers were found more in letters written for underrepresented medicine applicants.

Conclusion

On linguistic analysis, letters of recommendation written for obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants were similar overall compared with applicant race and gender.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : bias, equity, gender, letter of recommendation, medical education, medical students, obstetrics and gynecology residents, race, residency, residency applications


Plan


 K.K. was on the strategic advisory board for Boston Scientific and serves as an expert witness for Ethicon. M.G.M. serves as an expert witness for Ethicon. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
 This study was supported by a grant from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Biostatistical Collaboration Center, Northwestern University. The funding source did not have any role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit this article for publication.
 Cite this article as: Brown O, Mou T, Lim SI, et al. Do gender and racial differences exist in letters of recommendation for obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:554.e1-11.


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 225 - N° 5

P. 554.e1-554.e11 - novembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery
  • Alexander A. Berger, Jasmine Tan-Kim, Shawn A. Menefee
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Preoperative pudendal block with liposomal and plain bupivacaine reduces pain associated with posterior colporrhaphy: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
  • Katherine L. Dengler, Eric R. Craig, Angela M. DiCarlo-Meacham, Eva K. Welch, Daniel I. Brooks, Christine M. Vaccaro, Daniel D. Gruber

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.