Two Pathways to Self-Harm in Adolescence - 18/11/21
, Edwin S. Dalmaijer, DPhil a, Roma Siugzdaite, PhD a, Tamsin J. Ford, PhD b, Duncan E. Astle, PhD aRésumé |
Objective |
The behavioral and emotional profiles underlying adolescent self-harm, and its developmental risk factors, are relatively unknown. We aimed to identify subgroups of young people who self-harm (YPSH) and longitudinal risk factors leading to self-harm.
Method |
Participants were from the Millennium Cohort Study (N = 10,827). A clustering algorithm was used to identify subgroups who self-harmed with different behavioral and emotional profiles at age 14 years. We then traced the profiles back in time (ages 5−14 years) and used feature selection analyses to identify concurrent correlates and longitudinal risk factors of self-harming behavior.
Results |
There were 2 distinct subgroups at age 14 years: a smaller group (n = 379) who reported a long history of psychopathology, and a second, much larger group (n = 905) without. Notably, both groups could be predicted almost a decade before the reported self-harm. They were similarly characterized by sleep problems and low self-esteem, but there was developmental differentiation. From an early age, the first group had poorer emotion regulation, were bullied, and their caregivers faced emotional challenges. The second group showed less consistency in early childhood, but later reported more willingness to take risks and less security with peers/family.
Conclusion |
Our results uncover 2 distinct pathways to self-harm: a “psychopathology” pathway, associated with early and persistent emotional difficulties and bullying; and an “adolescent risky behavior” pathway, whereby risk taking and external challenges emerge later into adolescence and are associated with self-harm. At least one of these pathways has a long developmental history, providing an extended window for interventions as well as potential improvements in the identification of children at risk, biopsychosocial causes, and treatment or prevention of self-harm.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : self-harm, adolescence, socioemotional profiles, longitudinal analysis
Plan
| Ms. Uh is supported by the Gates Cambridge Trust. Drs. Dalmaijer and Astle are supported by grant TWCF0159 from the Templeton World Charity Foundation to Dr. Astle. Ms. Uh and Drs. Siugzdaite and Astle are supported by the UK Medical Research Council, grant MC-A0606-5PQ41. |
|
| This work has been previously posted on a preprint server: 2020.07.10.20150789. |
|
| Author Contributions Conceptualization: Uh, Ford, Astle Data curation: Uh Formal analysis: Uh, Dalmaijer, Astle Investigation: Uh, Astle Methodology: Uh, Dalmaijer, Siugzdaite, Ford, Astle Project administration: Uh, Astle Resources: Uh, Dalmaijer Software: Dalmaijer Supervision: Dalmaijer, Siugzdaite, Ford, Astle Validation: Uh, Dalmaijer, Siugzdaite, Ford, Astle Visualization: Uh, Dalmaijer, Siugzdaite, Astle Writing – original draft: Uh Writing – review and editing: Uh, Dalmaijer, Siugzdaite, Ford, Astle |
|
| The authors are grateful to the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS), UCL Institute of Education, for the use of these data and to the UK Data Service for making them available. However, neither CLS nor the UK Data Service bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretation of these data. The authors also wish to thank Emma Jayne Kilford, PhD, of the University College of London, for providing feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. |
|
| Disclosure: Drs. Dalmaijer, Siugzdaite, Ford, Astle and Ms. Uh have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. |
Vol 60 - N° 12
P. 1491-1500 - décembre 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
