S'abonner

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Ankle Fractures: A Population-Based Cohort Study - 20/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.017 
Keerat Grewal, MD, MSc a, b, c, , Clare L. Atzema, MD, MSc b, c, d, Rinku Sutradhar, PhD c, e, Karl Everett, MSc c, Daniel Horner, MBBS, MD f, g, Cameron Thompson, MSc a, John Theodoropoulos, MD, MSc h, Bjug Borgundvaag, PhD, MD a, i, Shelley L. McLeod, MSc, PhD a, j, Kerstin de Wit, MD, MSc k
a Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
b Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
c ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
d Department of Emergency Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
e Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
f Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK 
g Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 
h Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
i Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
j Department of Emergency Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada 
k Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

Temporary lower limb immobilization may be a risk for venous thromboembolism. The purpose of this study was to examine the 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with ankle fractures requiring temporary immobilization. Secondary objectives were to examine individual factors associated with venous thromboembolism in this population and to compare the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with ankle fractures against a priori-selected control groups.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using province-wide health datasets from Ontario, Canada. We included patients aged 16 years and older discharged from an ED between 2013 and 2018 with closed ankle fractures requiring temporary immobilization. We estimated 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism after ankle fracture. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism, censoring at 90 days or death. Patients with ankle fractures were then propensity score matched to 2 control groups: patients discharged with injuries not requiring lower limb immobilization (ie, finger wounds and wrist fractures) to compare relative hazard of venous thromboembolism.

Results

There were 86,081 eligible patients with ankle fractures. Incidence of venous thromboembolism within 90 days was 1.3%. Factors associated with venous thromboembolism were older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.39), venous thromboembolism or superficial venous thrombosis history (HR: 5.18; 95% CI: 4.33 to 6.20), recent hospital admission (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.68), recent nonankle fracture surgery (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.93), and subsequent surgery for ankle fracture (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.20). In the matched cohort, patients with ankle fractures had an increased hazard of venous thromboembolism compared to matched controls with finger wounds (HR: 6.31; 95% CI: 5.30 to 7.52) and wrist fractures (HR: 5.68; 95% CI: 4.71 to 6.85).

Conclusion

The 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients discharged from the ED with ankle fractures requiring immobilization was 1.3%. These patients had a 5.7- to 6.3-fold increased hazard compared to matched controls. Certain patients immobilized for ankle fractures are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, and this should be recognized by emergency physicians.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 36 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Timothy F. Platts-Mills, MD, MSc. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: KG, CLA, BB, SLM, JT, and KdW conceptualized the study. KG, CLA, RS, and KdW developed the data creation plan and analysis plan. KE conducted the analysis. CT conducted the validation study. All authors contributed to data interpretation. KG, KdW, and DH created the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors provided critical feedback and edits for the final manuscript. KG takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (seewww.icmje.org). This study received funding support from a CanVECTOR Research Start-Up Award. Dr Grewal was supported by a CanVECTOR fellowship award; the CanVECTOR Network receives grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference: CDT-142654). The funding agreement ensured the investigators maintained control over the study design, methods, and interpretation of the results. Dr Atzema was supported by a Mid-Career Investigator Awards from the Heart and Stroke Foundation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and ICES. Dr de Wit was supported by grants from Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation and the PSI Foundation.
 This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Ministry of Long-Term Care (MLTC). Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the MOH, MLTC, Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), and Cancer Care Ontario (CCO). The analyses, conclusions, opinions, and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement is intended or should be inferred. We thank IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc for use of their Drug Information File.
 The data set from this study is held securely in coded form at ICES. While data sharing agreements prohibit ICES from making the data set publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet prespecified criteria for confidential access, available at DAS. The full data set creation plan and underlying analytic code are available from the authors on request, understanding that the computer programs may rely on coding templates or macros that are unique to ICES and therefore are inaccessible or may require modification.
 Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide GPRH68G to Annals on this particular article.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2021  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 79 - N° 1

P. 35-47 - janvier 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • A Neutral Trial With an Improper Noninferiority Margin
  • Lauren E. Mamer, William J. Meurer
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Bloodless Management of the Anemic Patient in the Emergency Department
  • Kelly Johnson-Arbor, Richard Verstraete

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.