Real-world evidence: Methods for assessing long-term health and effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy - 03/03/22
, Marco Contoli, MD, PhD b, Celeste Porsbjerg, MD, PhD c, Sarah Buchs, MSc d, Julie Rask Larsen, MD, PhD d, Nick Freemantle, PhD eKey words : Allergic rhinitis, allergy, allergy immunotherapy, asthma, effectiveness, long-term follow-up, methodology, RCT, real-world evidence, retrospective cohort study, study design
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Plan
| Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: B. Fritzsching reports personal fees (for travel to study meetings) from ALK during conduct of the REACT study, as well as speaker honoraria from Novartis and Merck Sharp & Dohme outside the submitted work. M. Contoli reports personal fees from Alk-Abelló during conduct of the study and grants; in addition, he reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Zambon; and grants from University of Ferrara - Italy outside the submitted work. C. Porsbjerg reports grants from ALK, as well as grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Chiesi, Sanofi, and TEVA outside the submitted work. S. Buchs reports being employed at ALK-Abelló. J. R. Larsen reports being an employee of ALK. N. Freemantle reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Sanofi Aventis, Grifols, Novartis, Aimmune Therapeutics, Vertex, MSD, and Allergan outside the submitted work |
Vol 149 - N° 3
P. 881-883 - mars 2022 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
