Transcriptomic characterization of prurigo nodularis and the therapeutic response to nemolizumab - 05/04/22

Abstract |
Background |
Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a debilitating, difficult-to-treat, intensely pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by hyperkeratotic skin nodules. The pathogenesis of PN is not well understood but is believed to involve cross talk between sensory nerve fibers, immune cells, and the epidermis. It is centered around the neuroimmune cytokine IL-31, driving an intractable itch–scratch cycle.
Objective |
We sought to provide a comprehensive view of the transcriptomic changes in PN skin and characterize the mechanism of action of the anti–IL-31 receptor inhibitor nemolizumab.
Method |
RNA sequencing of biopsy samples obtained from a cohort of patients treated with the anti–IL-31 receptor inhibitor nemolizumab and taken at baseline and week 12. Generation and integration of patient data with RNA-Seq data generated from reconstructed human epidermis stimulated with IL-31 and other proinflammatory cytokines.
Results |
Our results demonstrate that nemolizumab effectively decreases IL-31 responses in PN skin, leading to effective suppression of downstream inflammatory responses including TH2/IL-13 and TH17/IL-17 responses. This is accompanied by decreased keratinocyte proliferation and normalization of epidermal differentiation and function. Furthermore, our results demonstrate how transcriptomic changes associated with nemolizumab treatment correlate with improvement in lesions, pruritus, stabilization of extracellular matrix remodeling, and processes associated with cutaneous nerve function.
Conclusion |
These data demonstrate a broad response to IL-31 receptor inhibition with nemolizumab and confirm the critical upstream role of IL-31 in PN pathogenesis.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Prurigo nodularis, nemolizumab, TH2, TH17, mechanism
Abbreviations used : AD, DEG, FDR, GO, HRP, IGA, MMP, mRNA, PN, PP-NRS, RHE, RT, SP
Plan
| The first 3 authors contributed equally to this article, and all should be considered first author. |
|
| This study was supported by Galderma. J. E. Gudjonsson and L. C. Tsoi are supported by the National Psoriasis Foundation, Babcock Endowment Fund, the National Institute of Health (R01-AR069071 and R01-AR073196 (J.E.G.), P30-AR075043 (J.E.G., L.C.T.), K01-AR072129 (L.C.T.), the A. Alfred Taubman Medical Research Institute (J.E.G., J.M.K.), as well as the O’Brien Kidney Research Core Center (P30DK081943) (to C.C.B.). |
|
| Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: J. E. Gudjonsson has served as a consultant to Almirall, BMS, Sanofi, AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Galderma; and has received research support from Almirall, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS/Celgene, Timberpharma, and Galderma. S. Ständer has served as a consultant to Almirall, Bayer, Beiersdorf, Bellus, Bionorice, Cara Therapeutics, Celgene, Clexio, DS Biopharma, Galderma, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Perrigo, Trevi Therapeutics, Dermasence, Galderma, Kiniksa, Sanofi, and Vanda Therapeutics. J. M. Kahlenberg has received grant support from Q32 Bio, Celgene/BMS, Ventus Therapeutics, and Janssen; and has served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Avion Pharmaceuticals, Provention Bio, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Ventus Therapeutics, and Boehringer Ingelheim. F. Hacini-Rachinel, P. Fogel, F. Rousseau, A. Lazzari, C. Piketty, V. Julia, and J. K. Krishnaswamy are employees of Galderma. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 149 - N° 4
P. 1329-1339 - avril 2022 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
