Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Prognostic Value of Fully Automated Measurement of Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain - 01/06/22

Abstract |
Background |
Right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) carries important diagnostic and prognostic significance in a variety of clinical settings, but its measurement is time consuming and operator dependent, limiting its value in routine clinical practice. Automated RVFWLS measurements can overcome these limitations. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, reproducibility, and prognostic implications of automated RVFWLS compared with manual assessment of RVFWLS.
Methods |
A total of 206 patients with a wide range of right ventricular (RV) function were retrospectively selected for this study. Fully automated (Auto-Strain), semiautomated (automated with editing), and manual (standard manual assessment) RVFWLS were measured using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in the same RV-focused apical four-chamber view. RV ejection fraction (RVEF) was measured using three-dimensional echocardiography. Abnormal RV systolic function was defined as RVEF < 45%. Agreement for RVFWLS measurements among the three different methods was based on a combination of Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analyses, and coefficients of variation (CVs).
Results |
Automated RVFWLS measurements were feasible in 204 subjects (99%). Automated (8 ± 1 sec/patient) and semiautomated (50 ± 10 sec/patient) assessments had shorter analysis times compared with manual measurement (103 ± 25 sec/patient, P < .001 for both). Semiautomated RVFWLS had a stronger correlation with manual RVFWLS than automated RVFWLS (r = 0.850 vs r = 0.708, P < .001). Semiautomated RVFWLS had smaller biases, narrower limits of agreement (LOA), and lower CVs against manual assessment in comparison with the fully automated method in the whole study population (bias of 0.62 and 1.15, LOA of 6.54 and 10.50, and CVs of 9.3% and 16.9%, respectively), in the subgroup with RVEF < 45% (bias of 0.81 and 1.43, LOA of 6.32 and 10.42, and CVs of 10.2% and 18.6%, respectively), and in those with RVEF ≥ 45% (bias of 0.34 and 0.73, LOA of 6.86 and 10.63, and CVs of 8.0% and 14.5%, respectively). Seventy-six patients experienced adverse cardiovascular events during a median follow-up period of 26 months. Fully automated, semiautomated, and manual RVFWLS were associated with poor outcomes. The prognostic implications of fully automated RVFWLS were inferior to those of semiautomated and manual RVFWLS. Three RVFWLS measurements were highly reproducible.
Conclusions |
Both fully automated and semiautomated RVFWLS provide rapid and reproducible assessments of RV function and carry important prognostic implication. Moreover, the semiautomated approach performs better than the fully automated method. Therefore, semiautomated RVFWLS can provide a better balance between feasibility and clinical significance and displays potential for clinical application.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Fully automated and semiautomated RVFWLS are highly feasible and reproducible. |
• | The semiautomated approach performs better than the fully automated method. |
• | The prognostic value of automated RVFWLS is inferior to that of semiautomated RVFWLS. |
• | The semiautomated method offers a balance between feasibility and clinical relevance. |
Keywords : Echocardiography, Speckle-tracking imaging, Right ventricular function, Free wall longitudinal strain
Abbreviations : 2D, 3D, AUC, CMR, CV, GLS, ICC, IQR, LOA, LV, NRI, ROC, RV, RVEF, RVFWLS
Plan
| This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81727805 and 81922033), the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei (grants 2020DCD015 and 2021BCA138), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant 5003530082), and the Shenzhen Science and Technology (grant SGDX20190917094601717). |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None. |
|
| Drs. Y. Li, C. Sun, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and J. Zhang contributed equally to this report. |
Vol 35 - N° 6
P. 609-619 - juin 2022 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
