Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry - 14/07/22
Abstract |
Background and Aims |
Higher adenoma detection rates reduce the risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). Clinically significant serrated polyps (CSSPs; defined as any sessile serrated polyp, traditional serrated adenoma, large [≥1 cm] or proximal hyperplastic polyp >5 mm) also lead to PCCRC, but there are no data on associated CSSP detection rates (CSSDRs). We used data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry (NHCR) to investigate the association between PCCRC risk and endoscopist CSSDR.
Methods |
We included NHCR patients with 1 or more follow-up events: either a colonoscopy or a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis identified through linkage with the New Hampshire State Cancer Registry. We defined our outcome, PCCRC, in 3 time periods: CRC diagnosed 6 to 36 months, 6 to 60 months, or all examinations (6 months or longer) after an index examination. We excluded patients with CRC diagnosed at or within 6 months of the index examination, with incomplete examinations, or with inflammatory bowel disease. The exposure variable was endoscopist CSSDR at the index colonoscopy. Cox regression was used to model the hazard of PCCRC on CSSDR controlling for age, sex, index findings, year of examination, personal history of colorectal neoplasia, and having more than 1 surveillance examination.
Results |
One hundred twenty-eight patients with CRC diagnosed at least 6 months after their index examination were included. Our cohort included 142 endoscopists (92 gastroenterologists). We observed that the risk for PCCRC 6 months or longer after the index examination was significantly lower for examinations performed by endoscopists with CSSDRs of 3% to <9% (hazard ratio [HR], .57; 95% confidence interval [CI], .39-.83) or 9% or higher (HR, .39; 95% CI, .20-.78) relative to those with CSSDRs under 3%.
Conclusions |
Our study is the first to demonstrate a lower PCCRC risk after examinations performed by endoscopists with higher CSSDRs. Both CSSDRs of 9% and 3% to <9% had statistically lower risk of PCCRC than CSSDRs of <3%. These data validate CSSDR as a clinically relevant quality measure for endoscopists.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Abbreviations : ADR, CRC, CSSDR, CSSP, HP, HR, NHCR, PCCRC, SSP, TSA
Plan
| DISCLOSURE: Dr Meester received financial support from the National Institutes of Health. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships. |
|
| See CME section, p. 373. |
|
| SEAM funding was received from the Department of Medicine at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center. The contents of this work do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. |
|
| If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Anderson at Joseph.Anderson@Dartmouth.edu. |
Vol 96 - N° 2
P. 310-317 - août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Do surgery residents and gastroenterology fellows learn colonoscopy at different rates?
- Umair Iqbal, David L. Diehl
- Setting a benchmark for serrated polyp detection rate: defining the target and terminology comes first
- Carole Macaron, Carol Rouphael, Carol A. Burke
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?