Longitudinal Arrhythmic Risk Assessment Based on Ejection Fraction in Patients with Recent-Onset Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy - 03/08/22
, Gianfranco Sinagra, MD, FESC aAbstract |
Background |
Practice guidelines suggest the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) ≤ 35% despite 3 to 6 months of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). It remains unclear whether this strategy is appropriate for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), who can experience reverse ventricular remodeling for up to 24 months after the initiation of GDMT. The aim of this study was to assess the longitudinal dynamic relationship between LVEF ≤ 35% and arrhythmic risk in patients with recent-onset nonischemic DCM on GDMT.
Methods |
A retrospective analysis was conducted among patients with recent-onset DCM (≤6 months) and recent initiation of GDMT (≤3 months) consecutively enrolled in a longitudinal registry. Risk for major ventricular arrhythmic events or sudden cardiac death was assessed in relationship to LVEF ≤ 35% at enrollment and 6 and 24 months after initiation of GDMT.
Results |
Five hundred forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. LVEF ≤ 35% identified patients with increased risk for major ventricular arrhythmic events or sudden cardiac death starting from 24 months after initiation of GDMT (hazard ratio, 2.126; 95% CI, 1.065-4.245; P = .03). However, LVEF ≤ 35% at presentation or 6 months after enrollment did not have prognostic significance. Sixty-seven percent of 131 patients with LVEF ≤ 35% at 6 months after initiation of GDMT had improved LVEFs (to >35%) by 24 months. This late LVEF improvement correlated with lower arrhythmic risk (P = .012) and was preceded by a reduction of LV dimensions in the first 6 months of GDMT.
Conclusions |
In patients with DCM, the present findings suggest that risk stratification for major ventricular arrhythmic events or sudden cardiac death on the basis of LVEF ≤ 35% is effective after 2 years of GDMT, but not after 6 months. In selected patients with DCM, it would be appropriate to wait 24 months before primary prevention ICD implantation.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | Primary prevention ICD indications in nonischemic DCM are still a matter of debate. |
• | Strategies based on LVEF after 3 months of therapy failed to demonstrate efficacy. |
• | Twenty-four months may be better for evaluation of DCM patients for ICD implantation. |
• | Early reduction of LV diameter on therapy identifies patients improving LVEF to >35%. |
• | Such late improvement is associated with lower long-term arrhythmic risk. |
Keywords : Dilated cardiomyopathy, Sudden cardiac death, Arrhythmic stratification, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Prognosis
Abbreviations : DCM, GDMT, HMDR, HR, ICD, LV, LVEDDi, LVEF, LVRR, MR, MVA, RV, SCD, VT
Plan
| Drs. De Angelis and Merlo share first authorship. |
|
| Drs. Adamo and Sinagra share last authorship. |
|
| Drs. Merlo and Sinagra are Members of ERN GUARD-HEART (European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Diseases of the Heart; guardheart.ern-net.eu). |
|
| Dr. Adamo was supported by National Institutes of Health grant 1K08HL145108-01A1. |
|
| Conflicts of Interest: None. |
Vol 35 - N° 8
P. 801 - août 2022 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
