S'abonner

Comparative study on the manually-controlled variable-rate versus fixed-rate infusion of norepinephrine for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery - 08/09/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110944 
Zhi-min Sheng, MD a, Yan-ping Shen, MD b, Zheng-bin Pan, MD b, Miao Zhu, MD b, Hao-tian Sun, MD b, Jin-ping Liu, MD b, Xiao-wei Qian, MD, PhD b,
a Department of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Taizhou, China 
b Department of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China 

Corresponding author at: Department of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Xueshi Road 1, Hangzhou 310006, China.Department of AnesthesiologyWomen's HospitalZhejiang University School of MedicineXueshi Road 1Hangzhou310006China

Abstract

Study objective

Previous studies have shown that prophylactic norepinephrine infusion is superior to intermittent bolus administration in preventing post-spinal hypotension. Nevertheless, it is still controversial whether manually-controlled variable-rate infusion is more effective than fixed-rate infusion. The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy of variable-rate infusion and fixed-rate infusion of norepinephrine for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension and maintaining hemodynamic stability during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery to determine more effective mode for clinical practice.

Design

A prospective randomized, controlled study.

Setting

Operating room, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

Patients

A total of 161 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia were randomized into Group F (fixed-rate infusion) and Group V (variable-rate infusion).

Interventions

Parturients received prophylactic norepinephrine infusion concurrent with the intrathecal injection at rate started at 0.05 μg/kg/min. In Group F, norepinephrine was administered continuously at a fixed (on-off) rate, and a bolus of norepinephrine 5 μg or 10 μg was given when systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased by 20% or more of baseline. In Group V, manually adjusted norepinephrine infusion within the range 0–0.14 μg/kg/min, according to SBP at 1-min intervals until delivery, aim to maintain values close to the baseline.

Measurements

During the study period, the incidence of maternal hypotension, hemodynamic performance, the number of physician interventions, reactive hypertension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, norepinephrine cumulative dose (before delivery), and neonatal outcomes were recorded.

Main results

The incidence of maternal hypotension was significantly lower in Group V than that in Group F (9% versus 30%) (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the serial changes in SBP and heart rate (HR) for the first 15 min. Group V showed higher frequency of physician interventions compared with the Group F (P < 0.001). The incidence of hypertension, severe hypotension, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, norepinephrine cumulative dose, and neonatal outcome were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

When norepinephrine was infused at an initial dose of 0.05 μg/kg/min for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, due to technical limitations of inadequate dose design in this study, neither a variable-rate infusion (need more physician intervention) nor a fixed-rate infusion regimen (experience more transient hypotension) was optimal. However, in terms of clinical importance, how to prevent the parturients from experiencing more incidence of hypotension might be a greater concern for anesthesiologists.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

It is still controversial whether manually-controlled variable-rate infusion is more effective than fixed-rate infusion of norepinephrine for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
The incidence of maternal hypotension was significantly lower in variable-rate infusion than that in fixed-rate infusion (9% versus 30%) (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the serial changes in SBP and HR for the first 15 min. Variable-rate infusion showed higher frequency of physician interventions compared with the fixed-rate infusion (P < 0.001).
When norepinephrine was infused at an initial dose of 0.05 μg/kg/min for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, neither variable-rate infusion nor fixed-rate infusion regimen was optimal.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Spinal anesthesia, Cesarean delivery, Norepinephrine, Variable-rate, Hypotension

Abbreviations : SBP, HR, PSH, CO, NIBP, CSF, SD


Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 82

Article 110944- novembre 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The association between erector spinae plane block timing and reduced rib fracture related respiratory complications: A cohort study
  • Jordanna Mladenovic, Ryan N. Erskine, Brooke Riley, Andrew Mitchell, Catherine Abi-fares, Willem Basson, Chris Anstey, Leigh White
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Evaluation of electronic screening in the preoperative process
  • Aneya van den Blink, Liedewij M.J. Janssen, Jeroen Hermanides, Stephan A. Loer, Fidessa K. Straat, Estaban N. Jessurun, Lothar A. Schwarte, Patrick Schober

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.