Levetiracetam versus Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Cohort Study - 28/12/22

Abstract |
Background |
Although phenobarbital (PB) is commonly used as a first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) for neonatal seizures, in 2015 we chose to replace it with levetiracetam (LEV), a third-generation ASM. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of LEV and PB as first-line ASM, considering the years before and after modifying our treatment protocol.
Methods |
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 108 neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-confirmed seizures treated with first-line LEV or PB in 2012 to 2020.
Results |
First-line ASM was LEV in 33 (31%) and PB in 75 (69%) neonates. The etiology included acute symptomatic seizures in 69% of cases (30% hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, 32% structural vascular, 6% infectious, otherwise metabolic) and neonatal epilepsy in 22% (5% structural due to brain malformation, 17% genetic). Forty-two of 108 (39%) neonates reached seizure freedom following first-line therapy. Treatment response did not vary by first-line ASM among all neonates, those with acute symptomatic seizures, or those with neonatal-onset epilepsy. Treatment response was lowest for neonates with a higher seizure frequency, particularly for those with status epilepticus versus rare seizures (P < 0.001), irrespective of gestational age, etiology, or EEG findings. Adverse events were noted in 22 neonates treated with PB and in only one treated with LEV (P < 0.001).
Conclusions |
Our study suggests a potential noninferiority and a more acceptable safety profile for LEV, which may thus be a reasonable option as first-line ASM for neonatal seizures in place of PB. Treatment should be initiated as early as possible since higher seizure frequencies predispose to less favorable responses.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Neonatal seizures, Phenobarbital, Levetiracetam, Term neonates, Preterm neonates
Plan
| Declarations of interest: None of the authors of the submitted manuscript have any conflicts of interest to declare. |
|
| Author Contributions: L.B., D.C., and G.R. wrote the manuscript and prepared the figures and tables; G.R. designed the study; L.B., C.D., A.R., and G.R. gathered and prepared the data; L.B., D.C., and G.R. analyzed the data; all authors reviewed, edited, and approved the manuscript. |
Vol 138
P. 62-70 - janvier 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
