Apical support after laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions: a randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal cuff closure techniques - 09/03/23
Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.050
K. Edmonds 1, C.M. Vaccaro 1, 3, C. Jones-Cox 1, 2, K.L. Dengler 1, 3, T.H. Le 1, 2, H. Gonzalez 1, 3, E.G. Lockrow 1, 2, S. Endicott 1, 2
1 Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
2 Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
3 Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
11
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| DISCLOSURE OF RELEVANT FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS: Kathryn Edmonds: Nothing to disclose; Christine M. Vaccaro: Nothing to disclose; Candice Jones-Cox: Nothing to disclose; Katherine L. Dengler: Nothing to disclose; Thuan H. Le: Nothing to disclose; Hector Gonzalez: Nothing to disclose; Ernest G. G. Lockrow: Nothing to disclose; Scott Endicott: Nothing to disclose. |
© 2022
Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Vol 228 - N° 3S
P. S821 - mars 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Temporal trends of hysterectomy modality for uterine prolapse in the united states, 2016-2019
- R. Deshpande, O. Foy, R. Mandelbaum, C. Dancz, K. Matsuo
- The patient-designed office visit: a qualitative study of social media users’ perspectives on an improved outpatient gynecologic experience
- J.J. Fitzgerald, C. Toal, R. Stewart, N. Meckes
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?