Variation in Provider Practice Patterns and the Perceived Need for a Shared Decision-making Tool for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction - 06/04/23
, Kevin J. Hebert, Rano Matta, Jeremy B. MyersRésumé |
Objective |
To evaluate neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) care providers’ current practice patterns, their perceived need for a shared decision-making tool for NLUTD management.
Methods |
We developed an electronic survey to assess multiple factors surrounding NLUTD management including practice patterns, perceived need for a decision aid and willingness to use it. Prior to survey dissemination, a panel of expert NLUTD care providers reviewed and provided a critique of the survey. It was delivered via email to the members of the Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons, and the Society of Urodynamics, female pelvic medicine and urogenital reconstruction between March and May 2022.
Results |
A total of 117 NLUTD care providers from 11 countries participated in this survey. Most participants were urologists (n: 109, 93%) working at academic teaching hospitals (n: 82, 70%). The most common treatments the providers had provided for stress urinary incontinence and detrusor overactivity were sling procedures (n: 76, 65%) and anticholinergics (n: 111, 95%). Participants believed that NLUTD management can be highly patient-specific and extensively vary from one individual to another. Most participants believed that patients performing clean intermittent catheterization have better QoL compared to those utilizing indwelling urinary catheters (n: 81, 69%). Participants believed there is a need for a NLUTD decision aid, and they expressed their willingness to use one if available.
Conclusion |
We found discordances between guideline recommendations, provider practice patterns, and patient-reported outcome measures and essential attributes that indicated the need for a decision aid to improve patient-provider communication and shared decision-making in NLUTD management.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Funding Support: None. |
Vol 174
P. 185-190 - avril 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
