Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: Results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial - 26/04/23
, Raf Van den Eynde, MD a
, Wouter Oosterlinck, MD, PhD b, c
, Layth Al Tmimi, MD, PhD a, b
, Peter Verbrugghe, MD, PhD b, c
, Jos Tournoy, MD, PhD d
, Steffen Fieuws, PhD e
, Steve Coppens, MD a, b
, Steffen Rex, MD, PhD a, b 
Abstract |
Study objective |
To investigate if an erector spinae plane (ESP) block decreases postoperative opioid consumption, pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing robotically-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (RAMIDCAB).
Design |
A single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Setting |
Postoperative period; operating room, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital ward in a university hospital.
Patients |
Sixty-four patients undergoing RAMIDCAB surgery via left-sided mini-thoracotomy and enrolled in the institutional enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery program.
Interventions |
At the end of surgery, patients received an ESP catheter at vertebra T5 under ultrasound guidance and were randomized to the administration of either ropivacaine 0.5% (loading dose of 30 ml and three additional doses of 20 ml each, interspersed with a 6 h interval) or normal saline 0.9% (with an identical administration scheme). In addition, patients received multimodal analgesia including acetaminophen, dexamethasone and patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. Following the final ESP bolus and before catheter removal, the position of the catheter was re-evaluated by ultrasound. Patients, investigators and medical personnel were blinded for the group allocation during the entire trial.
Measurements |
Primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption during the first 24 h after extubation. Secondary outcomes included location and severity of pain, presence/extent of sensory block, duration of postoperative ventilation and hospital length of stay. Safety outcomes comprised the incidence of adverse events.
Main results |
Median (IQR) 24-h morphine consumption was not different between the intervention- and control-groups, 67 mg (35–84) versus 71 mg (52–90) (p = 0.25), respectively. Likewise, no differences were detected in secondary and safety endpoints.
Conclusions |
Following RAMIDCAB surgery, adding an ESP block to a standard multimodal analgesia regimen did not reduce opioid consumption and pain scores.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Randomized and placebo-controlled trial for unilateral ESP block in cardiac surgery. |
• | Further research into dosing regimens for unilateral ESP block is required. |
• | Postoperative pain following MIDCAB surgery is not reduced with ESP block. |
• | ESP block did not reduce opioid consumption following MIDCAB surgery. |
• | Multimodal analgesia without ESP was sufficient following MIDCAB surgery. |
Keywords : Cardiac surgical procedures, Erector spinae plane block, Pain, Postoperative, Minimally invasive surgical procedures, enhanced recovery after surgery, Anesthesia, Cardiac procedures
Plan
Vol 87
Article 111088- août 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
