Comparative effectiveness of prophylactic strategies for preeclampsia: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - 28/04/23
, Chong-yang Duan, PhD c, Yan-xing Wei, MD, PhD d, e, f, g, h, Peng-cheng He, MD, PhD a, b, i, ⁎ 
Abstract |
Objective |
Preeclampsia is a common disease during pregnancy that leads to fetal and maternal adverse events. Few head-to-head clinical trials are currently comparing the effectiveness of prophylactic strategies for preeclampsia. In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy of prophylactic strategies for preventing preeclampsia in pregnant women at risk.
Data Sources |
Articles published in or before September 2021 from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, references of key articles, and previous meta-analyses were manually searched.
Study Eligibility Criteria |
Randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic strategies preventing preeclampsia with each other or with negative controls were included.
Methods |
Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias, and assessed evidence certainty. The efficacy of prophylactic strategies was estimated by frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analysis models. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia/ pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Results |
In total, 130 trials with a total of 112,916 patients were included to assess 13 prophylactic strategies. Low-molecular-weight heparin (0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.87), vitamin D supplementation (0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.95), and exercise (0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–0.92) were as efficacious as calcium supplementation (0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.82) and aspirin (0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.86) in preventing preeclampsia/pregnancy-induced hypertension, with a P score ranking of 85%, 79%, 76%, 74%, and 61%, respectively. In the head-to-head comparison, no differences were found between these effective prophylactic strategies for preventing preeclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertension, except with regard to exercise, which tended to be superior to aspirin and calcium supplementation in preventing pregnancy-induced hypertension. Furthermore, the prophylactic effects of aspirin and calcium supplementation were robust across subgroups. However, the prophylactic effects of low-molecular-weight heparin, exercise, and vitamin D supplementation on preeclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertension varied with different risk populations, dosages, areas, etc. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to very low.
Conclusion |
Low-molecular-weight heparin, vitamin D supplementation, exercise, calcium supplementation, and aspirin reduce the risk of preeclampsia/pregnancy-induced hypertension. No significant differences between effective prophylactic strategies were found in preventing preeclampsia. These findings raise the necessity to reevaluate the prophylactic effects of low-molecular-weight heparin, vitamin D supplementation, and exercise on preeclampsia.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : network meta-analysis, preeclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, prevention, prophylactic strategy
Plan
| Y.H.L., Y.S.Z., J.Y.C., and Z.J.W. share first authorship. |
|
| N.T., C.Y.D., Y.X.W., and P.C.H. are considered as cocorresponding authors. |
|
| The authors report no conflict of interest. |
|
| The Shuangqing Talent Program Project of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital was the primary funding source of this study. |
|
| This study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on October 4, 2021 (registration number: CRD42021274903). |
|
| Data sharing: All datasets generated for this study are included in the Supplemental Material. |
Vol 228 - N° 5
P. 535-546 - mai 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
