Dr. Uhre et al. Reply: - 15/05/23
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.04.013
Valdemar Funch Uhre, MSc a, b, c, Camilla Funch Uhre, MSc a, b, ⁎ 
, Nicole Nadine Lønfeldt, MSc, PhD a, Linea Pretzmann, MSc a, Signe Vangkilde, MSc, PhD a, b, Kerstin Jessica Plessen, MD, PhD d, Christian Gluud, MD, DrMedSci e, f, Janus Christian Jakobsen, MD, PhD e, g, Anne Katrine Pagsberg, MD, PhD a, b
, Nicole Nadine Lønfeldt, MSc, PhD a, Linea Pretzmann, MSc a, Signe Vangkilde, MSc, PhD a, b, Kerstin Jessica Plessen, MD, PhD d, Christian Gluud, MD, DrMedSci e, f, Janus Christian Jakobsen, MD, PhD e, g, Anne Katrine Pagsberg, MD, PhD a, b a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Capital Region, Denmark
b University of Copenhagen, Denmark
c Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark
d Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
e Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
f The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
g Holbæk Hospital, Denmark
∗Correspondence to Camilla Funch Uhre, MSc, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Capital Region, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900 Hellerup, DenmarkChild and Adolescent Mental Health CentreCapital RegionKildegårdsvej 28Hellerup2900Denmark
Résumé |
In a recent letter to the editor, a group of clinician-researchers posit that the conclusions in our published systematic review1 on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are based on inappropriate methodology. In this reply, we address the concerns expressed by Storch et al.2
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.| Author Contributions |
|
| Writing–original draft: V.F. Uhre |
|
| Writing–review and editing: V.F. Uhre, C.F. Uhre, Lønfeldt, Pretzmann, Vangkilde, Plessen, Gluud, Jakobsen, Pagsberg |
|
| Disclosure: Please see the disclosure statement in the original article published in the January 2020 issue. |
|
| All statements expressed in this column are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. See the Instructions for Authors for information about the preparation and submission of Letters to the Editor. |
© 2020
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 59 - N° 7
P. 787-791 - juillet 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Little Doubt That CBT Works for Pediatric OCD
- Eric A. Storch, Tara S. Peris, Alessandro De Nadai, John Piacentini, Michael Bloch, Matti Cervin, Joseph McGuire, Lara J. Farrell, James T. McCracken, Dean McKay, Bradley C. Riemann, Aureen Pinto Wagner, Martin Franklin, Sophie C. Schneider, John T. Walkup, Laurel Williams, Jonathan S. Abramowitz, S. Evelyn Stewart, Kate D. Fitzgerald, Wayne K. Goodman
- When Science Challenges Our Long-Held Assumptions About the Robustness of Evidence for Standard of Care
- Daniel A. Geller, Daniel Hosker
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?