Fetal Neurology Practice Survey: Current Practice and the Future Directions - 05/07/23

Abstract |
Background |
Fetal neurology is a rapidly evolving field. Consultations aim to diagnose, prognosticate, and coordinate prenatal and perinatal management along with other specialists and counsel expectant parents. Practice parameters and guidelines are limited.
Methods |
A 48-question online survey was administered to child neurologists. Questions targeted current care practices and perceived priorities for the field.
Results |
Representatives from 43 institutions in the United States responded; 83% had prenatal diagnosis centers, and the majority performed on-site neuroimaging. The earliest gestational age for fetal magnetic resonance imaging was variable. Annual consultations ranged from <20 to >100 patients. Fewer than half (n = 17.40%) were subspecialty trained. Most respondents (n = 39.91%) were interested in participating in a collaborative registry and educational initiatives.
Conclusions |
The survey highlights heterogeneity in clinical practice. Large multisite and multidisciplinary collaborations are essential to gather data that inform outcomes for fetuses evaluated across institutions through registries as well as creation of guidelines and educational material.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Fetal, Neurology, Practice, Counseling, Prognostic, Fetal MRI, Outcomes, Brain
Plan
| Conflict of interest and source of funding statement: The authors report no conflict of interest or competing financial interests in relation to the work. |
|
| Funding/support: No funding was secured for this study. |
|
| Clinical trial registration (if any): None. |
|
| Author contributions: Dr. Tarui conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Agarwal conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Agarwal has final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript in its final form. Drs. Agarwal and Tarui have full access to the data. Drs. Venkatesan, Gano, Pardo, Mulkey, Lemmon, Emrick, and Scher conceptualized and designed the study and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. |
Vol 145
P. 74-79 - août 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
