Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023 - 22/07/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264

Sébastien Bloc ^a,^b,⁎ , Pascal Alfonsi ^c, Anissa Belbachir ^d, Marc Beaussier ^e, Lionel Bouvet ^f, Sébastien Campard ^g, Sébastien Campion ^h,ⁱ, Laure Cazenave ^j,^k, Pierre Diemunsch ^l, Sophie Di Maria ^m, Guillaume Dufour ⁿ, Stéphanie Fabri ^o, Dominique Fletcher ^p, Marc Garnier ^q, Anne Godier ^r, Philippe Grillo ^s, Olivier Huet ^t, Alexandre Joosten ^u,^v, Sigismond Lasocki ^w, Morgan Le Guen ^x, Frédéric Le Saché ^b,^y, Isabelle Macquer ^z, Constance Marquis ^A, Jacques de Montblanc ^B, Axel Maurice-Szamburski ^s, Yên-Lan Nguyen ^C, Laura Ruscio ^B,^D, Laurent Zieleskiewicz ^E, Anaîs Caillard ^F, Emmanuel Weiss ^G,^H,^I
^a Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
^b Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France
^c Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris Descartes, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, F-75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
^d Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, UF Douleur, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP.Centre, Site Cochin, Paris, France
^e Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
^f Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
^g Clinique Jules-Verne, 44300 Nantes, France
^h AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France
ⁱ Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France
^j Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
^k Groupe Jeunes, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), 75016 Paris, France
^l Unité de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimations Chirurgicales, Samu-Smur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
^m Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
ⁿ Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
^o Faculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy, University of Malta, Malta
^p Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Service d'Anesthésie, 9, Avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
^q Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Service d’Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire Rive Droite, Paris, France
^r Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
^s Clinique Juge, Marseille, France
^t CHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France
^u Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
^v Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France
^w CHU d'Angers, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Angers, France
^x Paris Saclay University, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
^y DMU DREAM Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
^z Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Bordeaux, France
^A Clinique du Sport, Département d’Anesthésie et Réanimation, Médipole Garonne, 45 rue de Gironis - CS 13 624, 31036 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
^B Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
^C Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Cochin Academic Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
^D INSERM U 1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, Île-de-France, France
^E Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, C2VN, France
^F Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Cavale Blanche Université de Bretagne Ouest, Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Brest, France
^G Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP, Nord, Clichy, France
^H University of Paris, Paris, France
^I Inserm UMR_S1149, Centre for Research on Inflammation, Paris, France

^⁎Corresponding author at: Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.Clinical Research DepartmentAmbroise Pare Hospital GroupNeuilly-sur-SeineFrance

Abstract

Objective

The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs.

Design

A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence.

Methods

Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a “formalized expert recommendations” format.

Results

The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations.

Conclusions

Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Expert guidelines, Perioperative optimization program, Enhanced recovery after surgery

Plan

Introduction

Methods

General organization

The recommendation fields

Synthesis of the results

☆	Text validated by the Comité des Référentiels Cliniques (clinical guidelines committee) of the SFAR on 13/06/2022 and the Conseil d'Administration (board of directors) of the SFAR on 29/06/2022.

Export

Vol 42 - N° 4

Article 101264- août 2023 Retour au numéro

Article précédent

Management of patients suffering from mild traumatic brain injury 2023
Cédric Gil-Jardiné, Jean-François Payen, Rémy Bernard, Xavier Bobbia, Pierre Bouzat, Pierre Catoire, Anthony Chauvin, Yann-Erick Claessens, Bénédicte Douay, Xavier Dubucs, Damien Galanaud, Tobias Gauss, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, Thomas Geeraerts, Bertrand Glize, Sybille Goddet, Anne Godier, Pierrick Le Borgne, Geoffroy Rousseau, Vincent Sapin, Lionel Velly, Damien Viglino, Bernard Vigue, Philippe Cuvillon, Denis Frasca, Pierre-Géraud Claret

| Article suivant

Guidelines on human factors in critical situations 2023
Benjamin Bijok, François Jaulin, Julien Picard, Daphné Michelet, Régis Fuzier, Ségolène Arzalier-Daret, Cédric Basquin, Antonia Blanié, Lucille Chauveau, Jérôme Cros, Véronique Delmas, Danièle Dupanloup, Tobias Gauss, Sophie Hamada, Yann Le Guen, Thomas Lopes, Nathalie Robinson, Anthony Vacher, Claude Valot, Pierre Pasquier, Alice Blet

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

connectez-vous ou créez un compte

Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023 - 22/07/23

Abstract

Objective

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Plan

Export citations

Fichier

Contenu

Accès rapides

Mon compte

Aide & support

Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL