Flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass – A single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial - 13/10/23
, Gabriel Putzer, (MD) a, Bernhard Glodny, (MD) b, Tobias Hell, (PhD) c, Tom Barnes, (MD) d, Dietmar Enk, (MD) eAbstract |
Study objective |
Multifactorial comparison of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in terms of oxygenation in cardiac surgery patients after chest closure.
Design |
Prospective, non-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
Setting |
Operating theatre at an university hospital, Austria.
Patients |
Patients scheduled for elective, open, on-pump, cardiac surgery.
Interventions |
Participants were randomized to either individualized FCV (compliance guided end-expiratory and peak pressure setting) or control of PCV (compliance guided end-expiratory pressure setting and tidal volume of 6–8 ml/kg) for the duration of surgery.
Measurements |
The primary outcome measure was oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) 15 min after intraoperative chest closure. Secondary endpoints included CO2-removal assessed as required minute volume to achieve normocapnia and lung tissue aeration assessed by Hounsfield unit distribution in postoperative computed tomography scans.
Main results |
Between April 2020 and April 2021 56 patients were enrolled and 50 included in the primary analysis (mean age 70 years, 38 (76%) men). Oxygenation, assessed by PaO2/FiO2, was significantly higher in the FCV group (n = 24) compared to the control group (PCV, n = 26) (356 vs. 309, median difference (MD) 46 (95% CI 3 to 90) mmHg; p = 0.038). Additionally, the minute volume required to obtain normocapnia was significantly lower in the FCV group (4.0 vs. 6.1, MD -2.0 (95% CI -2.5 to ‐1.5) l/min; p < 0.001) and correlated with a significantly lower exposure to mechanical power (5.1 vs. 9.8, MD -5.1 (95% CI -6.2 to ‐4.0) J/min; p < 0.001). Evaluation of lung tissue aeration revealed a significantly reduced amount of non-aerated lung tissue in FCV compared to PCV (5 vs. 7, MD -3 (95% CI -4 to ‐1) %; p < 0.001).
Conclusions |
In patients undergoing on-pump, cardiac surgery individualized FCV significantly improved oxygenation and lung tissue aeration compared to PCV. In addition, carbon dioxide removal was accomplished at a lower minute volume leading to reduced applied mechanical power.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) allows for individualized ventilation strategies. |
• | FCV improved gas exchange compared to PCV in cardiac surgery. |
• | FCV improved lung aeration compared to PCV. |
• | FCV reduced mechanical impact of ventilation which may be beneficial. |
Keywords : Mechanical ventilation, Flow-controlled ventilation, Anesthesia, Computed tomography, Cardiac surgical procedures
Plan
Vol 91
Article 111279- décembre 2023 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
