Comparison of three echo-guidance techniques in percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for stroke prevention: Conventional transoesophageal, microprobe transoesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography - 28/10/23
for the ACTION Study Group
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | The number of PFO closures has increased since 2018. |
• | There is therefore a need to simplify the closure procedure. |
• | ICE and microTEE are mini-invasive alternatives to guide PFO closure. |
• | These techniques avoid the need for general anaesthesia. |
• | Their safety and efficacy are similar to conventional TEE under general anaesthesia. |
• | Fluoroscopic exposure time and X-ray dose were lower in the microTEE group. |
• | This finding reflects the decreased procedure time with microTEE. |
• | The main microTEE drawback is patient discomfort, especially during probe insertion. |
Abstract |
Background |
Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a consistent reduction in recurrent stroke after percutaneous transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy in patients with recent cryptogenic stroke.
Aim |
To compare the safety and efficacy of intracardiac echocardiography-guided and microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography-guided patent foramen ovale closure under local anaesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiography-guided patent foramen ovale closure under general anaesthesia.
Methods |
This prospective observational single-centre study included 194 consecutive patients scheduled for patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention of stroke from February 2018 to December 2019. Patients were asked to choose between an intracardiac echocardiography-guided, microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography-guided or transoesophageal echocardiography-guided procedure. The primary endpoint was the rate of successful closure at 6 months, defined as correct positioning of the device without severe shunt on 6-month contrast echocardiography.
Results |
Successful closure was high and did not differ between groups: 97.8% (95% confidence interval 88.5–99.9%) in the intracardiac echocardiography-guided group versus 96.9% (95% confidence interval 83.8–99.9%) in the microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography-guided group and 99.1% (95% confidence interval 95.3–99.9%) in the transoesophageal echocardiography-guided group (P=0.63). Adverse events related to patent foramen ovale closure were low and did not differ between groups.
Conclusion |
Our preliminary real-world experience suggests good efficacy and safety with intracardiac echocardiography and microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography guidance compared with conventional transoesophageal echocardiography guidance for percutaneous transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure in recurrent stroke prevention.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Patent foramen ovale, Intracardiac echography, Multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography, Microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography, Cryptogenic stroke, Structural heart disease
Abbreviations : 3D, CI, ICE, ICM, PFO, MicroTEE, TEE
Plan
Vol 116 - N° 11
P. 523-528 - novembre 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Mitral annular disjunction and Pickelhaube sign in children with mitral valve prolapse: A prospective cohort study
- Guy Vaksmann, Ivan Bouzguenda, Marie-Paule Guillaume, Pauline Gras, Valentina Silvestri, Adélaïde Richard
- Functional imaging after the “ISCHEMIA” trial
- Suzanne Duhamel, Théo Pezel, Jérôme Garot
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.