Network meta-analysis of temporary mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock - 16/11/23
, Atsuyuki Watanabe, MD b, #, Toshiki Kuno, MD, PhD c, Sripal Bangalore, MD, MHA d, Carlos L. Alviar, MD dRésumé |
We performed a network meta-analysis of 11 published randomized clinical trials examining the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in adults with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock, including 1,053 total patients with an observed in-hospital or 30-day mortality of 40.4%. None of the temporary MCS devices was associated with lower in-hospital or 30-day mortality compared with initial medical therapy or any other MCS device, either individually or in combination. These data do not support the routine use of temporary MCS devices for the purpose of reducing short-term mortality in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Vol 266
P. 184-187 - décembre 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Expectant management of patent ductus arteriosus for preterm infants: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Zuhair Majeed, Tajamal Hayat, Arslan Ahmed, Muhammad Haider Tariq, Abia Shahid, Anoop Titus, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Sardar Hassan Ijaz, Sunil J. Ghelani, Aparna Kulkarni, Sourbha S. Dani
- Angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A comparison of VANISH and INHERIT randomized trials
- Tino Severinsen, Jens Jakob Thune, Helga Lillian Gudmundsdottir, Christoffer Rasmus Vissing, Kasper Iversen, Carolyn Yung Ho, Henning Bundgaard, Anna Axelsson Raja
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?