Association between an anesthesia department development program for junior faculty and long-term production of publications: A longitudinal cohort study - 20/11/23
, Richard H. Epstein b, Bradley J. Hindman cAbstract |
Background |
An important mission of academic medical departments is to further the scholarship and education of its junior faculty. In 2013, Hindman et al. described the design and initial outcomes of a faculty development program for junior faculty at the University of Iowa Department of Anesthesia. In the current study, we reassessed whether the program increased the production of publications long-term. We included all department faculty, years before joining the department, and years after leaving the department, to control for the effects of simply being current faculty in the department, benefiting from its resources, and having had progressively more experience working.
Methods |
The population studied was the faculty for any period between January 2006 and December 2022. The dependent variable was the count of publications in Scopus each year with the faculty member's Scopus identifier, 1996 through 2022. The two-year faculty development program included non-clinical time, two mentors, defined mentorship plan, didactic program, and financial support for clinical and/or laboratory studies. Statistical analyses were with logistic and Poisson random effect models for panel data, with standard errors estimated using jackknife resampling.
Results |
Among the 128 distinct faculty in the department from 2006 through 2022, the 10% with the most publications per year accounted for 54% of the total annual publications. The two-year program was completed by 41% (53/128). Completion of the faculty development program was associated with a 17% absolute increase in the predicted marginal probability of one or more publications per year, from 25% to 41%. The 95% confidence interval for the 17% absolute increase was 9% to 24% (P < .0001). The predictive marginal effect of completing the program was 1.7 more publications per year per faculty (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.4, P < .0001). The estimate was also 1.7 more publications per year while limiting consideration to the 108 faculty who joined the department after 1996 and including as an independent variable the count of publications the year before joining the department.
Conclusions |
A faculty development program for junior faculty can reliably increase the production of publications in an anesthesiology department by at least one per year. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in publication production among faculty.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Earlier study described design and initial outcomes of a development program for junior faculty. |
• | Publications per year examined of all faculty at the department, in program or not, 2006–2022. |
• | The 10% faculty with most publications per year accounted for 54% of total annual publications. |
• | Development program had 17% absolute increase probability of ≥1 publications per year. |
• | Predictive marginal effect of completing program was 1.7 more publications per year per faculty. |
Plan
Vol 92
Article 111308- février 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Efficacy of propofol-based anesthesia against risk of brain swelling during craniotomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
- Chien-Cheng Liu, I-Wen Chen, Ping-Hsin Liu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Ting-Hui Liu, Po-Yu Huang, Chia-Hung Yu, Pei-Han Fu, Kuo-Chuan Hung
- American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification significantly affects the performances of machine learning models in intraoperative hypotension inference
- Zehua Dong, Xiaoyu Chen, Jodie Ritter, Lihui Bai, Jiapeng Huang
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?