Referral practices are associated with a delay in treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis and cholecystitis - 12/12/23
, MAJ.Rathnayaka M.K.D. Gunasingha a, b, 1, LT Sydney Dishman b, c, d, 1, LT Megan Bartel a, b, 1, CDR Matthew Bradley a, b, LCDR Carolyn Gosztyla a, b, d, 1Abstract |
Background |
The project was performed to determine if referrals to non-surgical providers after an initial presentation of symptomatic cholelithiasis are associated with a delay in surgical management.
Methods |
A single institution chart review of all adult patients who underwent a cholecystectomy from 2015 to 2019 was completed. Quantitative data was analyzed using independent t-tests.
Results |
Of 574 reviewed, 482 patients met criteria. Following initial presentation, 295 (61.2%) received a referral to surgery and 187 (38.8%) received follow up with a non-surgical provider. Those in the latter group had a significantly longer time from initial symptom presentation to surgical evaluation (65.7 days vs. 10.3 days, p < 0.001) and cholecystectomy (102.0 days vs 39.1 days, p < 0.001) when compared to the surgery referral group.
Conclusions |
This study demonstrated that cholecystectomy was significantly delayed for patients who had been referred to non-surgical providers after initial presentation, prolonging symptoms and increasing use of healthcare resources.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Non-surgical referrals for biliary colic are associated with delays to surgery. |
• | Non-surgical referrals for biliary colic corelate with increased resource utilization. |
• | Referral processes should be optimized for surgical management of biliary colic. |
Keywords : Cholecystitis, Cholelithiasis, Biliary colic, Referral
Plan
Vol 227
P. 96-99 - janvier 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
