Bilateral Rasmussen Encephalitis: Good Outcome Following Hemispherotomy - 11/01/24
, Dominic O. Co, MD, PhD b, Susan Rebsamen, MD c, Chris Ikonomidou, MD, PhD a, Raheel Ahmed, MD d, Andrew Knox, MD, MS aAbstract |
Background |
Bilateral Rasmussen encephalitis is a rare variant of a debilitating, typically unihemispheric disease with limited treatment options. Few cases with bilateral histopathology have been reported, all with poor seizure control following surgery. Here we report a favorable outcome following hemispherotomy in a four-year-old male with biopsy-confirmed bilateral disease.
Case |
The patient presented with right hemispheric focal seizures with behavioral arrest and over a year progressed to left lower extremity clonic seizures, epilepsia partialis continua, and loss of ambulation, with transient response to steroids and tacrolimus. Histopathology confirmed bilateral disease. The patient developed super-refractory status epilepticus and underwent right functional hemispherotomy 4.5 years after initial presentation. In a 2.5-year follow-up period, an Engel 1D outcome classification was observed with substantially improved quality of life.
Conclusion |
Previous reports of bilateral Rasmussen encephalitis describe universally poor outcomes, and hemispherotomy is often considered contraindicated. However, hemispherotomy in a patient with bilateral Rasmussen encephalitis may have a good outcome if seizures are unihemispheric.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Bilateral Rasmussen, Rasmussen encephalitis, Rasmussen syndrome, Chronic encephalitis, Epilepsy surgery
Plan
| Author contributions: N.T. contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising the article, and final approval of article. D.O.C. contributed to analysis and interpretation of data, revising article, and final approval of article. S.R. contributed to acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, revising article, and final approval of article. C.I. contributed to analysis and interpretation of data, revising article, and final approval of article. S.S. contributed to acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, revising the article, and final approval of article. R.A. contributed to analysis and interpretation of data, revising article, and final approval of the article. A.K. contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising the article, and final approval of article. |
|
| All coauthors have read and approved the version of the manuscript that is submitted. |
Vol 151
P. 1-4 - février 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
