Sex differences impact ergonomic endoscopic training for gastroenterology fellows - 16/01/24
Abstract |
Background and Aims |
Endoscopic-related injuries (ERIs) for gastroenterologists are common and can impact longevity of an endoscopic career. This study examines sex differences in the prevalence of ERIs and ergonomic training during gastroenterology fellowship.
Methods |
A 56-item anonymous survey was sent to 709 general and advanced endoscopy gastroenterology fellows at 73 U.S. training programs between May and June 2022. Demographic information was collected along with questions related to endoscopic environment, ergonomic instruction, technique, equipment availability, and ergonomic knowledge. Responses of female and male gastroenterology fellows were compared using χ2 and Fisher exact tests.
Results |
Of the 236 respondents (response rate, 33.9%), 113 (44.5%) were women and 123 (52.1%) were men. Female fellows reported on average smaller hand sizes and shorter heights. More female fellows reported endoscopic equipment was not ergonomically optimized for their use. Additionally, more female fellows voiced preference for same-gender teachers and access to dial extenders and well-fitting lead aprons. High rates of postendoscopy pain were reported by both sexes, with significantly more women experiencing neck and shoulder pain. Trainees of both sexes demonstrated poor ergonomic awareness with an average score of 68% on a 5-point knowledge-based assessment.
Conclusions |
Physical differences exist between male and female trainees, and current endoscopic equipment may not be optimized for smaller hand sizes. This study highlights the urgent need for formal ergonomic training for trainees and trainers with consideration of stature and hand size to enhance safety, comfort, and equity in the training and practice of endoscopy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviation : ERI
Plan
| DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION: We worked to ensure gender balance in the recruitment of human subjects. We worked to ensure ethnic or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human subjects. We worked to ensure that the language of the study questionnaires reflected inclusion. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as an under-represented gender minority in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as an under-represented ethnic minority in science. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we actively worked to promote gender balance in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work. |
Vol 99 - N° 2
P. 146 - février 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- The carbon cost of inappropriate endoscopy
- Luca Elli, Sergio La Mura, Alessandro Rimondi, Lucia Scaramella, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Fabio Monica, Marco Soncini, Matilde Topa, Francesco Bortoluzzi, Andrea Sorge, Flaminia Cavallaro, Nicoletta Nandi, Daniele Noviello, Alessandra Piagnani, Margherita Maregatti, Maja Caldato, Maurizio Vecchi
- Novel miniature transendoscopic telerobotic system for endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos)
- Xiaoxiao Yang, Huxin Gao, Shichen Fu, Rui Ji, Cheng Hou, Huicong Liu, Nan Luan, Hongliang Ren, Liping Sun, Jialin Yang, Zhifeng Zhou, Xiaoyun Yang, Lining Sun, Yanqing Li, Xiuli Zuo
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?