Intraprocedural assessment of ablation margins using computed tomography co-registration in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with percutaneous ablation: IAMCOMPLETE study - 31/01/24
, Kiki M van Dijk a, Bas Boekestijn a, Alexander Broersen b, Jacoba J van Duijn-de Vreugd a, Minneke J Coenraad c, Maarten E Tushuizen c, Arian R van Erkel a, Rutger W van der Meer a, Catharina SP van Rijswijk a, Jouke Dijkstra b, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei a, d, e, Mark C Burgmans aHighlights |
• | Ablation margin quantification is a promising tool to define technical success of thermal ablation of liver tumors, but no widely validated or standardized workflow is currently available. |
• | A standardized scanning protocol and workflow for ablation margin quantification was developed, yielding high inter-observer agreement for tumor segmentation and ablation margin quantification. |
• | Standardized quantification of the minimal ablation margin helps identify patients at risk of developing local tumor progression. |
Abstract |
Purpose |
The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of ablation margin quantification using a standardized scanning protocol during thermal ablation (TA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and a rigid registration algorithm. Secondary objectives were to determine the inter- and intra-observer variability of tumor segmentation and quantification of the minimal ablation margin (MAM).
Materials and methods |
Twenty patients who underwent thermal ablation for HCC were included. There were thirteen men and seven women with a mean age of 67.1 ± 10.8 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 49.1–81.1 years). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination under general anesthesia directly before and after TA, with preoxygenated breath hold. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examinations were analyzed by radiologists using rigid registration software. Registration was deemed feasible when accurate rigid co-registration could be obtained. Inter- and intra-observer rates of tumor segmentation and MAM quantification were calculated. MAM values were correlated with local tumor progression (LTP) after one year of follow-up.
Results |
Co-registration of pre- and post-ablation images was feasible in 16 out of 20 patients (80%) and 26 out of 31 tumors (84%). Mean Dice similarity coefficient for inter- and intra-observer variability of tumor segmentation were 0.815 and 0.830, respectively. Mean MAM was 0.63 ± 3.589 (SD) mm (range: -6.26–6.65 mm). LTP occurred in four out of 20 patients (20%). The mean MAM value for patients who developed LTP was -4.00 mm, as compared to 0.727 mm for patients who did not develop LTP.
Conclusion |
Ablation margin quantification is feasible using a standardized contrast-enhanced computed tomography protocol. Interpretation of MAM was hampered by the occurrence of tissue shrinkage during TA. Further validation in a larger cohort should lead to meaningful cut-off values for technical success of TA.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Ablation margin, Computed tomography, Thermal ablation, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Image processing
Abbreviations : BCLC, CECT, CT, CTCAE, DoS, EASL, eGFR, HCC, ICC, LI-RADS, LTP, MAM, MRI, MWA, RFA, SD, TA, vDSC
Plan
| Trial registration number: NCT04123340 |
Vol 105 - N° 2
P. 57-64 - février 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
