S'abonner

Tafoxiparin, a novel drug candidate for cervical ripening and labor augmentation: results from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled studies - 08/03/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.013 
Gunvor Ekman-Ordeberg, MD, PhD a, b, , Margareta Hellgren-Wångdahl, MD, PhD c, Annika Jeppson, MD, PhD d, Leena Rahkonen, MD, PhD e, Marie Blomberg, MD, PhD d, Karin Pettersson, MD, PhD f, Carina Bejlum, MD g, Malin Engberg, MD h, Mette Ludvigsen, MD, PhD i, Jukka Uotila, MD, PhD j, Kati Tihtonen, MD, PhD j, Gunilla Hallberg, MD, PhD k, Maria Jonsson, MD, PhD k
a Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden 
b Dilafor AB, Solna, Sweden 
c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden 
d Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 
f Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden 
g Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Älvsborg County Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden 
h Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden 
i Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark 
j Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland 
k Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 

Corresponding author: Gunvor Ekman-Ordeberg, MD, PhD.

Abstract

Background

Slow progression of labor is a common obstetrical problem with multiple associated complications. Tafoxiparin is a depolymerized form of heparin with a molecular structure that eliminates the anticoagulant effects of heparin. We report on 2 phase II clinical studies of tafoxiparin in primiparas. Study 1 was an exploratory, first-in-pregnant-women study and study 2 was a dose-finding study.

Objective

Study 1 was performed to explore the effects on labor time of subcutaneous administration of tafoxiparin before onset of labor. Study 2 was performed to test the hypothesis that intravenous treatment with tafoxiparin reduces the risk for prolonged labor after spontaneous labor onset in situations requiring oxytocin stimulation because of dystocia.

Study Design

Both studies were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Participants were healthy, nulliparous females aged 18 to 45 years with a normal singleton pregnancy and gestational age confirmed by ultrasound. The primary endpoints were time from onset of established labor (cervical dilation of 4 cm) until delivery (study 1) and time from start of study treatment infusion until delivery (study 2). In study 1, patients at 38 to 40 weeks of gestation received 60 mg tafoxiparin or placebo daily as 0.4 mL subcutaneous injections until labor onset (maximum 28 days). In study 2, patients experiencing slow progression of labor, a prolonged latent phase, or labor arrest received a placebo or 1 of 3 short-term tafoxiparin regimens (initial bolus 7, 21, or 35 mg followed by continuous infusion at 5, 15, or 25 mg/hour until delivery; maximum duration, 36 hours) in conjunction with oxytocin.

Results

The number of participants randomized in study 1 was 263, and 361 were randomized in study 2. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints between those receiving tafoxiparin and those receiving the placebo in both studies. However, in study 1, the risk for having a labor time exceeding 12 hours was significantly reduced by tafoxiparin (tafoxiparin 6/114 [5%] vs placebo 18/101 [18%]; P=.0045). Post hoc analyses showed that women who underwent labor induction had a median (range) labor time of 4.44 (1.2–8.5) hours with tafoxiparin and 7.03 (1.5–14.3) hours with the placebo (P=.0041) and that co-administration of tafoxiparin potentiates the effect of oxytocin and facilitates a shorter labor time among women with a labor time exceeding 6 to 8 hours (P=.016). Among women induced into labor, tafoxiparin had a positive effect on cervical ripening in 11 of 13 cases (85%) compared with 3 of 13 participants (23%) who received the placebo (P=.004). For women requiring oxytocin because of slow progression of labor, the corresponding results were 34 of 51 participants (66%) vs 16 of 40 participants (40%) (P=.004). In study 2, tafoxiparin had no positive effects on the secondary endpoints when compared with the placebo.

Except for injection-site reactions in study 1, adverse events were no more common for tafoxiparin than for the placebo among either mothers or infants. There were few serious or treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusion

Subcutaneous treatment with tafoxiparin before labor onset (study 1) may be effective in reducing the labor time among women undergoing labor induction and among those requiring oxytocin for slow progression of labor. Moreover, tafoxiparin may have a positive effect on cervical ripening. Short-term, intravenous treatment with tafoxiparin as an adjunct to oxytocin in patients with labor arrest (study 2) did not affect labor time or other endpoints. Both studies suggest that tafoxiparin has a favorable safety profile in mothers and their infants.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : dystocia, infants, labor induction, labor time, neonates, oxytocin, slow progress of labor


Plan


 G.E.O. and M.H.W. report owning shares in Dilafor AB. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
 Both studies reported here were sponsored by Dilafor AB, Solna, Sweden. Dilafor AB was involved in designing the study, writing the protocol, collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data, writing the report, and deciding to submit the article for publication.
 These studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT00710242 and NCT03001193 and with EU Clinical Trials Register under identifiers 2006-005839-20 (sponsor protocol number PPL02) and 2016-002118-40 (sponsor protocol number PPL07).
 Nonconfidential data that support the findings reported here are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


© 2022  The Author(s). Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 230 - N° 3S

P. S759-S768 - mars 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The physiology and pharmacology of oxytocin in labor and in the peripartum period
  • Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Failed induction of labor
  • Nina K. Ayala, Dwight J. Rouse

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.