Editorial: Conduct Disorder and Its 70-Year History: Lessons From Hervey Cleckley and Lee Robins - 26/03/24
Résumé |
If Cleckley1,2 and Robins3 were alive today, it is conceivable that they may argue about whether conduct disorder (CD) should be measured primarily with personality traits or behavioral characteristics. However, these strict demarcations may not be needed, or most helpful, for understanding youth with conduct problems. Recently, I proposed that CD might be best specified with 3 personality dimensions including grandiose-manipulative (GM), callous-unemotional (CU), and daring-impulsive (DI) traits.4 These traits are observable from an early age, appear to have a genetic basis, and have distinct correlates suggesting potentially differing etiologies relevant to understanding CD. Importantly, each domain is also related to conduct problems and delinquency.5
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.| The author has reported no funding for this work. |
|
| Disclosure: Dr. Salekin has reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. |
|
| All statements expressed in this column are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. See the Guide for Authors for information about the preparation and submission of Editorials. |
Vol 63 - N° 4
P. 404-406 - avril 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Editorial: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Stimulant Medication, and Criminality: Commentary and Caution
- Mark A. Stein, Margaret H. Sibley, Jeffrey H. Newcorn
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Risks of Anxiety Disorders in Offspring of Parents With Mood Disorders
- En-Nien Tu, Helen Manley, Kate E.A. Saunders, Cathy Creswell
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?