Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis - 20/05/24
, Naoto Kuroda, MD c, d, e, Kenichi Kano, MD a, Takanori Miura, MD c, f, Yuji Kamimura, MD, PhD c, g, Akihiro Shiroshita, MD, MPH c, hAbstract |
Study objective |
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures.
Methods |
We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).
Results |
We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: −1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −1.7 to −0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: −1.8; 95% CrI: −3.0 to −0.55, [low]; SMD: −1.4; 95% CrI: −2.0 to −0.72, [low]; SMD: −2.3; 95% CrI: −3.2 to −1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: −1.21; 95% CrI: −2.18 to −0.23, [very low]: SMD: −0.92; 95% CrI: −1.70 to −0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay.
Conclusions |
Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Supervising editor: Michael Gottlieb, MD. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors. |
|
| Author contributions: MH helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, performed the statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. NY helped in the conception and design of the study and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. NK helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. KK helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. TM helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. YK helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. AK helped in the conception and design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. NY takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
| Data sharing statement: The entire deidentified data set, data dictionary, and analytic code for this investigation are available on request from the date of article publication by contacting Minoru Hayashi, MD, at email (fukuiben17@yahoo.co.jp). |
|
| All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. |
|
| Fundingandsupport: By Annals’ policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors report no such relationships. The authors report this article did not receive any outside funding or support. Supported by the Systematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG). |
|
| Please see page 523 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
Vol 83 - N° 6
P. 522-538 - juin 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
