S'abonner

Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis - 20/05/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024 
Minoru Hayashi, MD a, Norio Yamamoto, MD b, c, , Naoto Kuroda, MD c, d, e, Kenichi Kano, MD a, Takanori Miura, MD c, f, Yuji Kamimura, MD, PhD c, g, Akihiro Shiroshita, MD, MPH c, h
a Department of Emergency Medicine Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Yotsui, Fukui, Japan 
b Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan 
c Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan 
d Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 
e Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan 
f Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita Rosai Hospital, Odate, Japan 
g Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicin, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan 
h Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures.

Methods

We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

Results

We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: −1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −1.7 to −0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: −1.8; 95% CrI: −3.0 to −0.55, [low]; SMD: −1.4; 95% CrI: −2.0 to −0.72, [low]; SMD: −2.3; 95% CrI: −3.2 to −1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: −1.21; 95% CrI: −2.18 to −0.23, [very low]: SMD: −0.92; 95% CrI: −1.70 to −0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Supervising editor: Michael Gottlieb, MD. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: MH helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, performed the statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. NY helped in the conception and design of the study and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. NK helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. KK helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. TM helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. YK helped in the conception and design of the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. AK helped in the conception and design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. NY takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Data sharing statement: The entire deidentified data set, data dictionary, and analytic code for this investigation are available on request from the date of article publication by contacting Minoru Hayashi, MD, at email (fukuiben17@yahoo.co.jp).
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Fundingandsupport: By Annals’ policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors report no such relationships. The authors report this article did not receive any outside funding or support. Supported by the Systematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG).
 Please see page 523 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.


© 2024  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 83 - N° 6

P. 522-538 - juin 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • From Barriers to Blocks: Overcoming Obstacles to Create Robust Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia Programs in Emergency Departments
  • Adrienne Malik
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Sound Decisions: Rethinking the Role of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Analgesia in the Emergency Department
  • Michael Gottlieb, Arun Nagdev

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.