Rethinking PIDs: Why the distinction between primary and secondary immune disorders is more frequently relevant than that between inborn and acquired errors of immunity - 05/06/24
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.01.018
Markus G. Seidel, MD ⁎ 
Styrian Children's Cancer Research Unit for Cancer and Inborn Errors of the Blood and Immunity in Children, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
∗Corresponding author: Markus G. Seidel, MD, Styrian Children's Cancer Research Unit for Cancer and Inborn Errors of the Blood and Immunity in Children, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 38, A-8036 Graz, Austria.Styrian Children's Cancer Research Unit for Cancer and Inborn Errors of the Blood and Immunity in ChildrenDivision of Pediatric Hematology-OncologyDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineMedical University of GrazAuenbruggerplatz 38GrazA-8036Austria
Key words : Inborn error of immunity, IEI, primary immunodeficiency, primary immune regulation disorder, PIRD, secondary immunodeficiency, primary immune disorder, PID, secondary immune disorder, SID, acquired error of immunity
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Plan
© 2024
American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 153 - N° 6
P. 1543-1545 - juin 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- T-cell receptor sequencing in interrogating antigen-specific T-cell responses to foreign and self-antigens
- Alexandra M. Johansson, William W. Kwok
- Should “primary immune disorder” replace “inborn error of immunity”? Names matter, but there is room for both
- Stuart E. Turvey, Catherine M. Biggs, Elliot L. James, Kyla J. Hildebrand
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?