Endoscopy ergonomics: a survey-based study exploring gender differences - 13/06/24
, Prithvi Patil, MS, Nirav C. Thosani, MD, MHAAbstract |
Background and Aims |
Women, on average, have smaller hand sizes as well as lower muscle mass and strength. With the increasing number of women entering training programs in gastroenterology, our aim was to study the subtle gender differences in endoscopy ergonomics.
Methods |
A survey instrument regarding demographic information, personal preferences in endoscopy styles and techniques, and endoscopy-related injury was sent to practicing gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was performed on the data.
Results |
The survey was answered by 107 gastroenterologists, 41 (38.3%) female subjects and 66 (61.7%) male subjects. Female participants were shorter in height, had smaller hand sizes, and performed fewer weekly cases. More men (45.5%) than women (20%) performed advanced endoscopic procedures. Women preferred the following: (1) holding the endoscope with the umbilical cord outside the forearm; (2) using the right hand to turn the small wheel; and (3) using a pediatric colonoscope to perform colonoscopy in a petite patient or one with a low body mass index. Endoscopy-related injury was reported in 49.5% of all gastroenterologists, with women reporting a significantly higher risk of injury (63.4%) than men (40.9%) (P = .02). Although higher weekly case volumes and performance of advanced endoscopy procedures were not independent risk factors for endoscopy-related injury, female gender was found to be an independent risk factor for injury.
Conclusions |
Gender differences exist in endoscopy styles and techniques, as well as endoscopy-related injury. Providing gender-specific training in endoscopy may improve ergonomics and decrease the risk of injury.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Plan
| DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION: We worked to ensure gender balance in the recruitment of human subjects. We worked to ensure that the language of the study questionnaires reflected inclusion. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as an under-represented gender minority in science. |
Vol 100 - N° 1
P. 17-26 - juillet 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
