S'abonner

Postpartum readmission risk: a comparison between stillbirths and live births - 17/09/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.017 
Lena C. Sweeney, MD a, , Uma M. Reddy, MD, MPH a, b, Katherine Campbell, MD, MPH a, Xiao Xu, PhD a, b
a Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 

Corresponding author: Lena C. Sweeney, MD.

Abstract

Background

Stillbirth occurs more commonly among pregnant people with comorbid conditions and obstetrical complications. Stillbirth also independently increases maternal morbidity and imparts a psychosocial hazard when compared with live birth. These distinct needs and burden may increase the risk for postpartum readmission after stillbirth.

Objective

This study aimed to examine the risk for maternal postpartum readmission after stillbirth in comparison with live birth and to identify indications for readmission and the associated risk factors.

Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort of patients with singleton stillbirths or live births, delivered at ≥20 weeks’ gestation, who were identified from the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission within 6 weeks of discharge from the childbirth hospitalization. The association between stillbirth (vs live birth) and risk for readmission was assessed using multivariable regression models with adjustment for maternal age, sociodemographic characteristics, maternal and obstetrical conditions, and delivery characteristics. Within the stillbirth group, risk factors for readmission were further examined using multivariable regression. The secondary outcomes included principal indication for readmission (categorized based on principal diagnosis code of the readmission hospitalization) and timing of readmission (number of weeks after childbirth hospitalization). Differences in these secondary outcomes were compared between the stillbirth and live birth groups using chi-square tests. All analyses accounted for the complex sample design to generate nationally representative estimates.

Results

Postpartum readmission occurred in 2.7% of 16,636 patients with stillbirths, whereas it occurred in 1.6% of 2,870,677 patients with live births (unadjusted risk ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.47–1.86). The higher risk for readmission after stillbirth (vs live birth) persisted after adjusting for maternal, obstetrical, and delivery characteristics (adjusted risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.46). The distribution of principal indication for readmission differed after stillbirth and after live birth and included hypertension (30.2% vs 39.5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.63–0.93), mental health or substance use disorders (6.8% vs 3.6%; unadjusted risk ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–3.16), and venous thromboembolism (5.8% vs 2.0%; unadjusted risk ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.60–5.17). Among patients with stillbirths, 56.0% of readmissions occurred within 1 week, 71.8% within 2 weeks, and 88.1% within 4 weeks; the timing of readmission did not differ significantly between the stillbirth and live birth cohorts. Pregestational diabetes (adjusted risk ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–2.93), gestational diabetes (adjusted risk ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–2.71), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted risk ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–2.47), obesity (adjusted risk ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–2.12), and primary cesarean delivery (adjusted risk ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–2.58) were associated with a higher risk for readmission after stillbirth, whereas higher household income was associated with a lower risk for readmission (eg, adjusted risk ratio for income ≥$82,000 vs $1–$47,999, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.77).

Conclusion

When compared with live births, the risk for postpartum readmission was higher after stillbirths, even after adjustment for differences in the patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Readmission for mental health or substance use disorders and venous thromboembolism is more common after stillbirths than after live births.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Video


(8.34 Mo)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : fetal death, maternal health, postpartum care, pregnancy, readmission, severe maternal morbidity, stillbirth


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This study was funded by the Albert McKern Scholar Award from the Yale University Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences. The funding source had no role in the design, conduction, or preparation of this research.
 The findings of this study were presented at the 43rd annual pregnancy meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, San Francisco, CA, February 6–11, 2023.
 Cite this article as: Sweeney LC, Reddy UM, Campbell K, et al. Postpartum readmission risk: a comparison between stillbirths and live births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;231:463.e1-14.


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 231 - N° 4

P. 463.e1-463.e14 - octobre 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Maternal vaccination against COVID-19 and neonatal outcomes during Omicron: INTERCOVID-2022 study
  • Fernando C. Barros, Robert B. Gunier, Albertina Rego, Loïc Sentilhes, Stephen Rauch, Serena Gandino, Jagjit S. Teji, Jim G. Thornton, Alisa B. Kachikis, Ricardo Nieto, Rachel Craik, Paolo I. Cavoretto, Adele Winsey, Paola Roggero, Gabriel B. Rodriguez, Valeria Savasi, Erkan Kalafat, Francesca Giuliani, Marta Fabre, Anne Caroline Benski, Irma Alejandra Coronado-Zarco, Stefania Livio, Adela Ostrovska, Nerea Maiz, Fabiola R. Castedo Camacho, Ashley Peterson, Philippe Deruelle, Carolina Giudice, Roberto A. Casale, Laurent J. Salomon, Constanza P. Soto Conti, Federico Prefumo, Ehab Zakaria Mohamed Elbayoumy, Marynéa Vale, Valeria Hernández, Katherine Chandler, Milagros Risso, Emily Marler, Daniela M. Cáceres, Guadalupe Albornoz Crespo, Ernawati Ernawati, Michal Lipschuetz, Shabina Ariff, Ken Takahashi, Carmen Vecchiarelli, Teresa Hubka, Satoru Ikenoue, Gabriela Tavchioska, Babagana Bako, Adejumoke I. Ayede, Brenda Eskenazi, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Stephen H. Kennedy, Aris T. Papageorghiou, Jose Villar, INTERCOVID-2022 International Consortium
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The use of bubble charts in analyzing second stage cesarean delivery rates
  • Man Wai Catherine Hung, Lin Tai Linus Lee, Christopher Pak Hey Chiu, Man Kee Teresa Ma, Yuen Yee Yannie Chan, Lee Ting Kwong, Eunice Joanna Wong, Theodora Hei Tung Lai, Oi Ka Chan, Po Lam So, Wai Lam Lau, Tak Yeung Leung, HKCOG Research Group

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.