S'abonner

Effect of NeuroSAFE-guided RARP versus standard RARP on erectile function and urinary continence in patients with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial - 01/04/25

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00091-9 
Eoin Dinneen, PhD a, e, *, Ricardo Almeida-Magana, MD a, e, *, Tarek Al-Hammouri, MD a, b, e, Shengning Pan, PhD c, Baptiste Leurent, PhD c, Aiman Haider, MD d, Alex Freeman, MD d, Nicholas Roberts, BSc a, b, Chris Brew-Graves, MSc b, Jack Grierson, MRes a, Rosie Clow, BSc b, Norman Williams, ProfPhD a, Jon Aning, MD g, Thomas Walton, MD i, Raj Persad, MD g, Neil Oakley, MD j, Imran Ahmad, ProfPhD k, Lorenzo Dutto, MD k, Timothy Briggs, MD e, Clare Allen, MD f, Zafer Tandogdu, MD a, e, James Adshead, MD l, Jon Oxley, MD h, John Kelly, ProfMD a, e, Greg Shaw, ProfMD a, e,
for the

NeuroSAFE PROOF Investigators

  Members listed in the Supplementary Material)
Sue Mallet, Nicola Muirhead, Elena Pizzo, Jiunn Wang, Simon Rodney, Ismail Moghul, Anna Silvanto, Luis Beltran, Marzena Ratynska, Imen Ben-Salah, Rhys Ball, Larissa Mendes, Senthil Nathan, Ashwin Sridhar, Anand Kelkar, Mahi Manoharan, Aisha Akilo, Victoria Garner, Marta Cobos-Arrivabene, Katie Jones, Caroline Jones, Lyndsey Johnson, Samantha Clarke, Sophie Short, Thomas Mannucheril John, Sue Morgan, Fawzia Tahir, Nicola Perks, Laura Cockayne, Katherine Behennah, Victoria Hallworth, Leigh Fiorentino, Cecilia Mason, Nicola Santoni, Jonathan Salmond, Natasha Parker, Nicola Thomson, Rowan McDougall, Amy Cumming, Barbara McLaren, Kirsty Forsyth, Sahar Azad, Zsolt Hodi, Jan Hallas, Sahar Elkady, Sophie Cusick, Josh Shepherd, Kerri Jenkins

a Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK 
b Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK 
c Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK 
d Department of Histopathology, University College London, London, UK 
e Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
f Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
g Department of Urology, North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Bristol, UK 
h Department of Histopathology, North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Bristol, UK 
i Department of Urology, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK 
j Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK 
k Department of Urology, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK 
l Department of Urology, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof Greg Shaw, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, London, UK Department of Urology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London NW1 2BU UK

Summary

Background

Sparing the periprostatic neurovascular bundles during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) improves postoperative erectile function and early urinary continence recovery. The NeuroSAFE technique, a standardised frozen section analysis, enables accurate real-time detection of positive surgical margins during nerve-sparing, increasing the likelihood of successful nerve preservation. However, the impact of the technique on patient outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effect of NeuroSAFE-guided RARP versus standard RARP on erectile function and urinary continence.

Methods

NeuroSAFE PROOF was a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial done at five National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Key eligibility criteria were a diagnosis of non-metastatic prostate cancer deemed suitable to undergo RARP, good erectile function (defined as a score of ≥22 on the first 5 items of the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) without medical erectile function assistance, and no previous prostate cancer treatment. No age limits were applied. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard RARP or NeuroSAFE-guided RARP using block randomisation, stratified by site. Masking of participants to allocation was maintained throughout, but patients were informed of their nerve-sparing status after the operation. Due to the nature of the intervention, operating teams were aware of treatment group. Nerve-sparing was guided by a preoperative plan in the standard RARP group and by intraoperative NeuroSAFE assessment in the NeuroSAFE group. The primary outcome was erectile function at 12 months, assessed using the IIEF-5 score, in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned participants who had surgery. Secondary endpoints were urinary continence scores at 3 and 6 months, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), and the erectile function domain of the IIEF (IIEF-6) scores at 12 months. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03317990.

Findings

Between Jan 6, 2019, and Dec 6, 2022, 407 patients were recruited, of whom 381 had surgery (190 participants in the NeuroSAFE group and 191 participants in the standard RARP group), and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Data for the primary outcome (IIEF-5 score at 12 months) were available for 344 participants (173 in the NeuroSAFE group and 171 participants in the standard RARP group). Median follow-up was 12·3 months (IQR 11·8–12·7). At 12 months, the mean IIEF-5 score was 12·7 (SD 8·0) in the NeuroSAFE group versus 9·7 (7·5) in the standard RARP group (adjusted mean difference 3·18 [95% CI 1·62 to 4·75]; p<0·0001). At 3 months, the ICIQ score was significantly lower in the NeuroSAFE group than the standard RARP group (adjusted mean difference –1·41 [95% CI –2·42 to –0·41]; p=0·006). At 6 months, no significant difference in ICIQ score was observed between groups (adjusted mean difference –0·37 [95% CI –1·35 to 0·62]; p=0·46). At 12 months, the mean IIEF-6 score was higher in the NeuroSAFE group than in the standard RARP group (15·3 [SD 9·7] vs 11·5 [SD 9·0]; adjusted mean difference 3·92 [95% CI 2·01 to 5·83]; p<0·0001). Serious adverse events occurred in six (3%) of 190 patients in the NeuroSAFE group, and and in five (3%) of 191 patients in the standard RARP group. All adverse events were postoperative complications; no serious adverse events or deaths were attributed to the study intervention.

Interpretation

The use of NeuroSAFE to guide nerve-sparing during RARP improves patient-reported IIEF-5 scores at 12 months and short-term urinary continence. The erectile function benefit is enhanced in patients who would not otherwise have undergone bilateral nerve-sparing by standard practice.

Funding

National Institute of Healthcare Research, JP Moulton Charitable Foundation, UCLH Charity, St Peters Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2025  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 26 - N° 4

P. 447-458 - avril 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Trastuzumab rezetecan, a HER2-directed antibody–drug conjugate, in patients with advanced HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (HORIZON-Lung): phase 2 results from a multicentre, single-arm study
  • Ziming Li, Yan Wang, Yuping Sun, Linlin Wang, Xingya Li, Longhua Sun, Zhiyi He, Haiyan Yang, Yongsheng Wang, Qiming Wang, Zhengbo Song, Wei Hong, Yong Wang, Guohao Xia, Yan Yu, Min Peng, Yong Song, Donglin Wang, Rui Meng, Jian Fang, Yongzhong Luo, Wenhua Liang, Sheng Hu, Zhihui Wang, Ke Song, You Li, Lulu Yang, Wei Shi, Shun Lu
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer (HYDRA): an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials in the MARCAP consortium
  • Amar U Kishan, Yilun Sun, Alison C Tree, Emma Hall, David Dearnaley, Charles N Catton, Himanshu R Lukka, Gregory Pond, W Robert Lee, Howard M Sandler, Felix Y Feng, Paul L Nguyen, Luca Incrocci, Wilma Heemsbergen, Floris J Pos, Eric Horwitz, Jessica Karen Wong, Karen E Hoffman, Comron Hassanzadeh, Deborah A Kuban, Stefano Arcangeli, Giuseppe Sanguineti, Stephane Supiot, Gilles Crehange, Igor Latorzeff, Tahmineh Romero Kalbasi, Michael L Steinberg, Luca F Valle, Andrew Loblaw, John Nikitas, Soumyajit Roy, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Angela Y Jia, Daniel E Spratt

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.