Comparative balanced salt solution and 6 % hydroxyethyl starch in goal-directed therapy for major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis - 26/05/25

Abstract |
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) improves postoperative outcomes in various surgeries, but the optimal fluid choice between balanced salt solutions (BSS) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) remains debated. This meta-analysis compared postoperative outcomes of GDFT using BSS versus 6 % HES in elective major abdominal surgery. Comprehensive database searches identified eight RCTs (1739 patients) published between 2000 and 2024. No significant differences were found in overall postoperative complications [RR 1.04 (95 % CI 0.90–1.20); p = 0.59], including renal, cardiovascular, respiratory complications, or mortality. However, BSS required significantly higher intraoperative fluid volumes [SMD 0.61 (95 % CI 0.42–0.80); p < 0.001] and led to greater postoperative fluid balance [SMD 0.39 (95 % CI 0.20–0.59); p < 0.001]. 6 % HES should not be used routinely. GDFT using BSS achieves the same outcomes at a lower cost and without the risk of bleeding.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Meta-analysis compares BSS and 6 % HES in GDFT for major abdominal surgery. |
• | No significant differences in postoperative complications or mortality. |
• | BSS requires higher intraoperative fluid volumes than 6 % HES. |
• | Evidence highlights the cost-effectiveness of BSS for equivalent outcomes. |
Plan
Vol 245
Article 116355- juillet 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
