In bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (BMVP), Doppler-based echocardiographic quantification techniques of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity may be inaccurate and volumetric assessment by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR), might better reflect volume overload. However, the optimal method for measuring Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) in the presence of severe prolapse is unknown. Indeed, at end-systole, the LV base can either be defined at the annulus (functional method) or at the leaflets’ level (anatomical method).

We aimed to compare these two methods and their association with post-surgical cardiac remodeling.

Consecutive patients referred for evaluation of MR were assessed with echocardiography and/or CMR at baseline and patients were invited to repeat CMR within 12 months of surgical repair/replacement (when performed). Only patients with BMVP were analyzed. Mitral regurgitant volume was calculated using direct quantitative method with LVESV measured either at the annulus or at the leaflets, and the respective correlations with the absolute reduction in LV end-diastolic volume after surgery were compared (Figure 1, Figure 2).

Among 33 BMVP patients included, 14 eventually underwent surgery and 11 had both pre- and post-operative CMR. Pre-operative LVEF was 59.5±5.6% in the functional group versus 49.1±8.2% in the anatomical group. The mitral Regurgitant Volume (MRV) was overestimated by 23.8±14.5ml in the functional compared to the anatomical group (Figure 1). Only the anatomical measure of the MRV was significantly correlated with post-operative left ventricular remodeling (r=0.65, P<0.05) (Figure 2).

Our results indicate a better ability to predict post-surgical LV remodeling with the anatomical compared to the functional method in BMVP. The anatomical method may be the method of choice for the quantification of MR severity with CMR in BMVP but these preliminary results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort.