S'abonner

Social and Economic Patterning in Ultra-Processed Food Intake in Toddlerhood and Middle Childhood: Longitudinal Data From the Gemini Cohort in the United Kingdom - 19/06/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.jand.2025.01.004 
Gabriella N. Heuchan, MSc , Rana E. Conway, PhD, Harry Tattan-Birch, PhD, Lisa Heggie, MSc, Clare H. Llewellyn, PhD
 Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, United Kingdom 

Address correspondence to Gabriella N. Heuchan, MSc, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.Institute of Epidemiology and HealthcareUniversity College London1-19 Torrington PlLondonWC1E 7HBUK

Abstract

Background

Children’s consumption of ultra-processed food (UPF) may contribute to inequalities in obesity and wider health. Socioeconomic patterning in younger UK children’s UPF intake is unknown.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate socioeconomic patterning of UK toddlers’ (aged 21 months) and children’s (aged 7 years) UPF intake across several household and neighborhood indicators.

Design

Secondary analysis of data from a prospective longitudinal cohort study using parent-reported sociodemographic data and 3-day diet diaries.

Participants/setting

Participants were children from the UK Gemini study of 4804 twins born in 2007. At ages 21 months and 7 years, 2591 and 592 children, respectively, had at least 2 days of dietary data.

Main outcome measures

This study measured percentage energy from UPF at 21 months and 7 years of age, classified using the NOVA system.

Statistical analyses performed

Unadjusted linear regression models were run for household socioeconomic position (SEP) composite score; index of multiple deprivation decile; income; occupation level; mother’s age; education of mother and partner; and child’s ethnicity, sex, and age. Adjusted multivariable linear regression models were adjusted for ethnicity and all SEP indicators except SEP composite score (adjusted 1), in addition to child sex and age (adjusted 2). Missing data were addressed with multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting. CIs and P values were adjusted to account for clustering within families.

Results

Children of lower SEP had higher UPF intake across several indicators. Mother’s education was the strongest predictor; postgraduate education was associated with 8.64% (95% CI –12.08% to –5.20%; P < .001) and 10.12% (95% CI, –15.68% to –4.56%; P < .001) less energy from UPF at 21 months and 7 years, respectively, compared with no educational qualifications in adjusted model 2.

Conclusions

UK children from more disadvantaged backgrounds consumed a greater proportion of their energy from UPF. Mother's education seemed to be the most influential factor. Socioeconomic inequalities, particularly in maternal education, may drive disparities in diet quality and associated health outcomes. Addressing these gaps is essential to reduce childhood obesity and improve long-term health in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Ultra-processed food, Child nutrition, Socioeconomic position, Inequalities, Western diets


Plan


 Supplementary materials: Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 8, Table 9, Table 10, Table 11 are available at www.jandonline.org/
 STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
 FUNDING/SUPPORT This work forms part of Gabriella Heuchan’s PhD, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council. This project was also supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The Gemini study was funded by a grant from Cancer Research UK (C1418/A7974) awarded to Professor Jane Wardle. Cancer Research UK had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection management, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation, review or the approval of the manuscript.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank the Gemini families for participating in the study.
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS All authors conceptualized the design of the study. G. N Heuchan and L. Heggie completed data cleaning. G. N Heuchan and H. Tattan-Birch completed the data analysis and interpretation. G. N Heuchan drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and edited multiple iterations. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


© 2025  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 125 - N° 7

P. 922 - juillet 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Higher Dietary Inflammatory Index Score Is Associated With a Greater Risk of High Allostatic Load in US Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017-2020
  • Yiru Li, Yuhong Li
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Home Visitation as an Intervention Opportunity to Prevent Childhood Obesity Within the First 2000 Days: A Scoping Review
  • Jamie Zeldman, Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman, Matthew J. Gurka, Karla P. Shelnutt, Amy R. Mobley

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.