Antithrombotic approach in percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI): What is our standard of care? A study endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology - 21/06/25
, Gianfranco Butera b, Thomas Krasemann c, Ruth Heying d, e, Ina Michel-Behnke f, Damien Bonnet a, g, Sophie Malekzadeh-Milani aCet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | This study reviews antithrombotic use after percutaneous pulmonary valve repair. |
• | No strong evidence exists for the best treatment approach. |
• | Most centres use aspirin after the procedure and for long-term care. |
• | Valve leaflet thickening raises concern about treatment effectiveness. |
• | Large studies are needed to guide safe and effective patient care. |
Abstract |
Background |
Despite the widespread adoption of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation, there remains a lack of consensus on the optimal management of peri-interventional and long-term antithrombotic therapies because of a lack of evidence.
Aim |
To clarify current practices in peri/postprocedural antithrombotic strategies for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation.
Methods |
An online survey was submitted to the Interventional Working Group of the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology, and was completed by 76 congenital interventional cardiologists in 2023–2024.
Results |
Overall, 86% had standardized protocols for anticoagulation/antiaggregation. Intraprocedural heparin administration of 100IU/kg was common (83%), and postprocedural strategies mostly included acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) (45%) or a combination of antiaggregation and anticoagulation (29%). Long-term strategies comprised antiaggregation (88%), no therapy (11%) and anticoagulation only (1%). Acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy was prescribed by 91%, whereas 9% used dual antiaggregation therapy. Dual antiaggregation therapy was continued for suspicious medical history of thrombotic complication or microthrombi for 3–6 months. Testing for acetylsalicylic acid resistance was infrequent (36%), and only if clinically indicated. When patients had pre-established anticoagulation therapy, 59% changed their strategy. Treatment changes based on valve type were rare (8%). The primary reasons for anticoagulation/antiaggregation were to increase valve longevity (26%) and for both longevity and endocarditis prophylaxis (68%). Acute valve thrombosis was reported in 11 cases.
Conclusions |
The survey reveals variability in practices after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Most interventional cardiologists prefer acetylsalicylic acid for postprocedural and long-term management, whereas dual antiaggregation therapy is sometimes used in specific cases. Anticoagulation is limited to pre-existing therapy cases or isolated experiences for 3 months.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : PPVI, Anticoagulation, Antiaggregation, Thrombosis, Pulmonary valve replacement
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
