Sample size estimates for biomarker-based outcome measures in clinical trials in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease - 02/07/25
, Katy E Morgan c, 1, Antoinette O'Connor a, Thomas D Veale a, Ian B Malone a, Teresa Poole c, Tammie LS Benzinger d, Brian A Gordon d, e, Laura Ibanez f, g, Yan Li f, Jorge J. Llibre-Guerra f, Eric McDade f, Guoqiao Wang f, Jasmeer P Chhatwal h, Gregory S Day i, Edward Huey j, Mathias Jucker k, l, Johannes Levin m, n, o, Yoshiki Niimi p, James M Noble q, Jee Hoon Roh r, Racquel Sánchez-Valle s, Peter R Schofield t, u, Randall J Bateman e, f, v, Chris Frost c, 2, Nick C Fox a, b, 2The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN)
Highlights |
• | Sample sizes were estimated for trials in presymptomatic autosomal dominant AD. |
• | Both point estimates of sample sizes and measures of uncertainty were computed. |
• | Detecting a 25 % reduction in amyloid PET after 4 years needs 40–70 carriers per arm. |
• | 250–900 carriers per arm would be needed to detect 50 % slowing in neurodegeneration. |
• | Sample sizes are reduced across outcomes when mildly impaired carriers are included. |
Abstract |
Introduction |
Alzheimer disease (AD)-modifying therapies are approved for treatment of early-symptomatic AD. Autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) provides a unique opportunity to test therapies in presymptomatic individuals.
Methods |
Using data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), sample sizes for clinical trials were estimated for various cognitive, imaging, and CSF outcomes. Sample sizes were computed for detecting a reduction of either absolute levels of AD-related pathology (amyloid, tau) or change over time in neurodegeneration (atrophy, hypometabolism, cognitive change).
Results |
Biomarkers measuring amyloid and tau pathology had required sample sizes below 200 participants per arm (examples CSF Aβ42/40: 47[95 %CI 25,104], cortical PIB 49[28,99], CSF p-tau181 74[48,125]) for a four-year trial in presymptomatic individuals (CDR=0) to have 80 % power (5 % statistical significance) to detect a 25 % reduction in absolute levels of pathology, allowing 40 % dropout. For cognitive, MRI, and FDG, it was more appropriate to detect a 50 % reduction in rate of change. Sample sizes ranged from 250 to 900 (examples hippocampal volume: 338[131,2096], cognitive composite: 326[157,1074]). MRI, FDG and cognitive outcomes had lower sample sizes when including indivduals with mild impairment (CDR=0.5 and 1) as well as presymptomatic individuals (CDR=0).
Discussion |
Despite the rarity of ADAD, presymptomatic clinical trials with feasible sample sizes given the number of cases appear possible.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Alzheimer's disease, Clinical trials, Autosomal dominant, Longitudinal, Sample size, MRI, PET, CSF, ß-amyloid, Linear mixed effects models
Plan
Vol 12 - N° 6
Article 100133- juin 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
