BrainAGE latent representation clustering is associated with longitudinal disease progression in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease - 21/08/25
, Grégory Kuchcinski a, c, d, Vincent Roca a, Adeline Rollin Sillaire e, f, Maxime Bertoux c, e, Xavier Delbeuck a, c, d, Jean-Pierre Pruvo a, c, d, Simon Lecerf c, e, f, Florence Pasquier c, e, f, Thibaud Lebouvier c, e, f, Renaud Lopes a, cAbstract |
Introduction |
Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) population is a clinically, genetically and pathologically heterogeneous condition. Identifying biomarkers related to disease progression is crucial for advancing clinical trials and improving therapeutic strategies. This study aims to differentiate EOAD patients with varying rates of progression using Brain Age Gap Estimation (BrainAGE)-based clustering algorithm applied to structural magnetic resonance images (MRI).
Methods |
A retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort consisting of 142 participants who met the criteria for early-onset probable Alzheimer’s disease was conducted. Participants were assessed clinically, neuropsychologically and with structural MRI at baseline and annually for 6 years. A Brain Age Gap Estimation (BrainAGE) deep learning model pre-trained on 3,227 3D T1-weighted MRI of healthy subjects was used to extract encoded MRI representations at baseline. Then, k-means clustering was performed on these encoded representations to stratify the population. The resulting clusters were then analyzed for disease severity, cognitive phenotype and brain volumes at baseline and longitudinally.
Results |
The optimal number of clusters was determined to be 2. Clusters differed significantly in BrainAGE scores (5.44 [± 8] years vs 15.25 [± 5 years], p < 0.001). The high BrainAGE cluster was associated with older age (p = 0.001) and higher proportion of female patients (p = 0.005), as well as greater disease severity based on Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (19.32 [±4.62] vs 14.14 [±6.93], p < 0.001) and gray matter volume (0.35 [±0.03] vs 0.32 [±0.02], p < 0.001). Longitudinal analyses revealed significant differences in disease progression (MMSE decline of -2.35 [±0.15] pts/year vs -3.02 [±0.25] pts/year, p = 0.02; CDR 1.58 [±0.10] pts/year vs 1.99 [±0.16] pts/year, p = 0.03).
Conclusion |
K-means clustering of BrainAGE encoded representations stratified EOAD patients based on varying rates of disease progression. These findings underscore the potential of using BrainAGE as a biomarker for better understanding and managing EOAD.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, Brain age gap estimation, Clustering, Magnetic resonance imaging
Abbreviations : Alzheimer’s disease, artificial intelligence, brain reserve, brain age gap estimation, clinical dementia rating scale, clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes, cortical total volume, cerebrospinal fluid, early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, hippocampal sparing, intracranial volume, late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, limbic predominant, mean absolute error, mini mental state examination, magnetic resonance imaging, predicted age difference, stochastic gradient descent, typical Alzheimer’s disease, visual association test
Plan
Vol 52 - N° 5
Article 101365- septembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- The Role of MRI as a key evaluator of mesenchymal stem Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Mohammadreza Elhaie, Abolfazl Koozari, Mohammadhossein Mozafari, Iraj Abedi
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?