S'abonner

Predictors of Emergency Physician Productivity in a National Emergency Medicine Group - 18/09/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.02.002 
Jonathan J. Oskvarek, MD, MBA a, b, , Mark S. Zocchi, PhD, MPH c, Bernard S. Black, JD, MA j, Laura G. Burke, MD, MPH d, Marika Kachman, MD a, Andrew Leubitz, DO, MBA a, e, Ali Moghtaderi, PhD f, Dhimitri A. Nikolla, DO, MS a, g, Nishad Rahman, MD a, h, Jesse M. Pines, MD, MBA a, i
a US Acute Care Solutions, Canton, OH 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Summa Health System, Akron, OH 
c The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 
d Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 
e Adventist Shady Grove Medical Center, Rockville, MD 
f Department of Health Policy and Management, the Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 
g Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Erie, PA 
h Department of Emergency Medicine, Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, MD 
i Department of Emergency Medicine; George Washington University, Washington, DC 
j Pritzker School of Law and Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Study objectives

We sought to identify physician and environmental factors (eg, crowding) associated with emergency physician productivity, measured as patients per hour. We also assessed whether physician productivity is associated with higher emergency department (ED) return rates.

Methods

We used data from 184 EDs in 24 states staffed by a national ED group from January 2021 to December 2022. Clinical outcomes were 72-hour returns and returns with admission. We performed multivariable linear regression models that included physician, shift, and facility characteristics.

Results

We examined 234,146 shifts among 2,099 physicians. The mean number of patients per hour was 1.94 (SD = 0.57). Physician factors associated with a higher number of patients per hour included younger age and longer tenure at a site, with the number of patients per hour increasing even after 60+ months at a site. Longer tenure at a site was associated with a higher number of patients per hour (0.06 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.02 to 0.09] at 6 months and 0.11 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.15] at 12 months). The number of patients per hour was weakly associated with shifts worked in the prior 3 to 30 days (0.003 number of patients per hour [95% CI 0.002 to 0.004] for each additional shift). Overnight shifts, non-Monday shifts, more physicians working on shift, and longer shift lengths were associated with a lower number of patients per hour. The number of patients with ED length of stay more than 6 hours (boarding patients) was negatively associated with the number of patients per hour. The higher number of patients per hour, both within site and within physician, was associated with slightly decreased 72-hour returns but no meaningful difference in returns with admission.

Conclusion

Both physician- and shift-level factors are associated with emergency physician number of patients per hour. Higher number of patients per hour is not associated with increased 72-hour returns with admission.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Productivity, Crowding, Boarding, 72-hour returns, Patient safety


Plan


 Supervising editor: Hemal K. Kanzaria, MD. Specific detailed information about possible conflicts of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: All authors conceived the study and designed the analyses. BSB provided advice on study design. MSZ took the lead role in analyzing the data. JO drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. JO takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Data sharing statement: We are not able to share data because the data is proprietary.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals’ policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). JMP has received payments from CSL Behring, Medtronic, Abbott Point of Care, and Astra-Zeneca for unrelated work. The rest of the authors of the paper report no such relationships. This study did not receive any funding.
 Please see page 348 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide HK5TX97 to Annals on this particular article.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2025  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 86 - N° 4

P. 347-358 - octobre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Unmasking a Hidden Arrhythmia Substrate
  • János Tomcsányi, Béla Bózsik, Kristóf Tomcsányi
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Differences in Productivity and Clinical Care Between Permanent Staff, Employed Travel, and Locum Tenens Emergency Physicians
  • Dhimitri A. Nikolla, Mark S. Zocchi, Bernard S. Black, Jonathan J. Oskvarek, Laura G. Burke, Marika M. Kachman, Ali Moghtaderi, Nishad Rahman, John Bedolla, Jestin N. Carlson, Jesse M. Pines, US Acute Care Solutions Research Group

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.