S'abonner

Reevaluating optimal weight changes across the stages of pregnancy - 19/09/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.025 
Diana Aboukhater, MD a, Misa Hayasaka, MD a, Juliana Martins, MD a, George Saade, MD a, Tetsuya Kawakita, MD, MS a, b,
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences Eastern Virginia Medical School at ODU, Norfolk, VA 
b Center for Maternal and Child Health Equity and Advocacy, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 

Corresponding author: Tetsuya Kawakita, MD, MS.

Abstract

Background

While the National Academy of Medicine, formerly known as the Institute of Medicine, recommends the optimum weight change in the second and third trimesters combined, the ideal weight change range per week according to trimesters remains unexplored.

Objective

To determine the optimal rates of weight change per week that are associated with decreased adverse pregnancy outcomes for each trimester stratified by prepregnancy body mass index categories.

Study design

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study using data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (2010–2014). Our exposure was the weight change per week, defined as weight change (kg) divided by gestational weeks interval. We examined weight change per week for each trimester: weight change in early pregnancy (early first trimester to second trimester); second trimester (second trimester to third trimester); and third trimester (third trimester to delivery). Our primary outcome was a composite of adverse pregnancy outcomes including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm birth, spontaneous preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age birth, and stillbirth. To explore potential nonlinear associations between pregnancy weight change and adverse pregnancy outcomes, we applied restricted cubic spline functions with 5 knots. We calculated adjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals using generalized linear models with Poisson distribution and robust error variance, controlling for confounders. We estimated adjusted relative risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes for each weight change per week and identified the optimal weight change. The optimal weight change was compared with the National Academy of Medicine–recommended weight change in pregnancy.

Results

Of the 8121 patients included, 4373 (53.8%) had a normal or underweight body mass index, 2002 (24.7%) had an overweight body mass index, and 1746 (21.5%) had an obese body mass index. The weight changes per week associated with the lowest adverse risks for individuals with normal/underweight, overweight, and obese body mass index were 0.7 kg/wk, 0.7 kg/wk, and 0.6 kg/wk, respectively, for the first trimester, 0.7 kg/wk, 0.5 kg/wk, and 0.5 kg/wk, respectively, for the second trimester, and 0.5 kg/wk, 0.4 kg/wk, and 0.4 kg/wk, respectively, for the third trimester. For normal/underweight, weight gain according to the National Academy of Medicine guidelines in the second trimester compared to our optimal weight gain was associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and preterm birth. For normal/underweight and overweight individuals in the second trimester, weight gain according to the National Academy of Medicine guidelines, compared to our optimal weight gain, was associated with an increased risk of small for gestational age. Conversely, for individuals with obesity in the third trimester, weight gain according to the National Academy of Medicine guidelines compared to our optimal weight gain was associated with a decreased risk of cesarean delivery.

Conclusion

The gestational weight change rates associated with the lowest adverse risks were of higher values than those established by the National Academy of Medicine, which may suggest that the National Academy of Medicine guidelines are too strict.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : cesarean delivery, first trimester, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, pregnancy weight gain, pregnancy weight loss, second trimester, small-for-gestational age, third trimester


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 T.K. is funded by the Junior Clinical Investigator Program (JCIP) at Eastern Virginia Medical School (VHS 241231).
 Cite this article as: Aboukhater D, Hayasaka M, Martins J, et al. Reevaluating optimal weight changes across the stages of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025;233:317.e1-19.


© 2025  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 233 - N° 4

P. 317.e1-317.e19 - octobre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The fetal brain neurosonography in trisomy 21: the seagull sign and thinned subplate
  • Ritsuko K. Pooh, Megumi Machida, Kohtaro Uenishi, Enoch Q.S. Barreto, Isabella Yi Man Wah, Liona C. Poon, Kyoko Itoh, Takako Nakamura, Hideaki Chiyo, Hiroyasu Ohashi, Masayoshi Takeda, Osamu Shimokawa, Yoichi Matsubara
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Characterization of the association between birth weight and severe postpartum hemorrhage in women with delivery at term
  • Isabelle Attali, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Hugo Madar, Lola Loussert, Camille Le Ray, Diane Korb, ENP2021 study group, Camille Le Ray, Nathalie Lelong, Hélène Cinelli, Béatrice Blondel, Nolwenn Regnault, Virginie Demiguel, Elodie Lebreton, Benoit Salanave, Jeanne Fresson, Annick Vilain, Thomas Deroyon, Philippe Raynaud, Sylvie Rey, Khadoudja Chemlal, Nathalie Rabier-Thoreau, Frédérique Colombet-Migeon

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.