Age-specific associations between intrinsic capacity impairments and self-rated health in community-dwelling adults: Insights from Taiwan longitudinal study on aging - 30/09/25
, Fei-Yuan Hsiao a, b, l, ⁎ 
Abstract |
Background |
The World Health Organization's Integrated Care for Older People framework emphasizes intrinsic capacity (IC) assessment, yet the relationship between specific intrinsic capacity impairments and self-rated health (SRH) across different age groups remains inadequately characterized.
Objectives |
To analyze age-specific associations between six IC domains and self-rated health using Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging data, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and health factors.
Methods |
We extracted 3,330 participants with good or poor self-rated health, stratified into three age groups: 55−64 years (n = 1,278), 65−74 years (n = 1,011), and 75+ years (n = 1,041). Five sequential logistic regression models assessed associations between IC impairments (locomotor capacity, vitality, vision, hearing, cognition, psychological capacity) and self-rated health, adjusting for sex, education, marital status, employment, economic satisfaction, chronic conditions, smoking, drinking, physical exercise, and sleep quality.
Results |
IC impairment prevalence increased with age: 17.2% (55−64), 38.2% (65−74), and 61.5% (75+). After adjustment, age-specific patterns of IC impairments associated with poor self-rated health emerged. In middle-aged adults (55−64), locomotor capacity showed the strongest association with poor self-rated health (OR = 14.61, 95% CI: 3.50–61.01), though the wide confidence interval reflects the low prevalence of impairment. Psychological capacity (OR = 5.96, 95% CI: 3.32–10.69) could thus be the most dominant IC impairment that is linked to poor self-rated health in this age group. For young-old adults (65−74), locomotor capacity had the greatest impact (OR = 4.19, 95% CI: 2.02–8.67), followed by psychological capacity (OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 2.33–5.82) and vitality (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.11–4.16). In the oldest adults (75+), vitality became particularly important (OR = 4.17, 95% CI: 2.22–7.84), alongside with psychological capacity (OR = 3.15, 95% CI: 2.18–4.56) and locomotor capacity (OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.52–3.17).
Conclusions |
Age-specific patterns suggest targeted interventions: mental health support for middle-aged adults, mobility preservation for young-old adults, and vitality enhancement for the oldest adults. These findings provide guidance for age-tailored ICOPE strategies.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Intrinsic capacity, Self-rated health, Community-dwelling adults, Integrated care for older people framework
Plan
Vol 29 - N° 11
Article 100688- novembre 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
